ReviewJMIR public health and surveillance2018
Sentiment Analysis of Health Care Tweets: Review of the Methods Used.
Review in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
71 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Developing a standardized protocol for computational sentiment analysis research using health-related social media data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Pooled it
- Applying natural language processing and machine learning techniques to patient experience feedback: a systematic review.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Pooled it
- Observational
- An ensemble-based sentiment analysis approach for precision medicine recommendation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer Screening Knowledge and Sentiments in Singaporean Women: Mixed Methods Study Using Topic Modeling, Sentiment Analysis, and Structured Questionnaire Data.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Measuring nationwide US online media mentions of fish found in the North Central Region.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Critical Care Pain Observation Tool for Families (CPOT-Fam).Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026Article
- Assessing patient perceptions of off-label cannabidiol use for insomnia through sentiment analysis.Journal of cannabis research · 2025Article
- Transforming Patient Feedback Into Actionable Insights Through Natural Language Processing: Knowledge Discovery and Action Research Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Messaging and Information in Mental Health Communication on Social Media: Computational and Quantitative Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Public Versus Academic Discourse on ChatGPT in Health Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Equity and reliability of public electric vehicle charging stations in the United States.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Combining Topic Modeling, Sentiment Analysis, and Corpus Linguistics to Analyze Unstructured Web-Based Patient Experience Data: Case Study of Modafinil Experiences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Tracking the Spread of Pollen on Social Media Using Pollen-Related Messages From Twitter: Retrospective Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Uncovering the Complexity of Perinatal Polysubstance Use Disclosure Patterns on X: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Differences in Fear and Negativity Levels Between Formal and Informal Health-Related Websites: Analysis of Sentiments and Emotions.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Using Natural Language Processing to Explore Social Media Opinions on Food Security: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- A Comparison of ChatGPT and Fine-Tuned Open Pre-Trained Transformers (OPT) Against Widely Used Sentiment Analysis Tools: Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Survey Data.JMIR mental health · 2024Article
- Enhancing machine learning-based sentiment analysis through feature extraction techniques.PloS one · 2024Article
- Quantitative and qualitative analysis of individual experiences post botulinum toxin injection - United Kingdom Survey.Skin health and disease · 2023Article
11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTwitter is a microblogging service where users can send and read short 140-character messages called "tweets." There are several unstructured, free-text tweets relating to health care being shared on Twitter, which is becoming a popular area for health care research. Sentiment is a metric commonly used to investigate the positive or negative opinion within these messages. Exploring the methods used for sentiment analysis in Twitter health care research may allow us to better understand the options available for future research in this growing field.
objectiveThe first objective of this study was to understand which tools would be available for sentiment analysis of Twitter health care research, by reviewing existing studies in this area and the methods they used. The second objective was to determine which method would work best in the health care settings, by analyzing how the methods were used to answer specific health care questions, their production, and how their accuracy was analyzed.
methodsA review of the literature was conducted pertaining to Twitter and health care research, which used a quantitative method of sentiment analysis for the free-text messages (tweets). The study compared the types of tools used in each case and examined methods for tool production, tool training, and analysis of accuracy.
resultsA total of 12 papers studying the quantitative measurement of sentiment in the health care setting were found. More than half of these studies produced tools specifically for their research, 4 used open source tools available freely, and 2 used commercially available software. Moreover, 4 out of the 12 tools were trained using a smaller sample of the study's final data. The sentiment method was trained against, on an average, 0.45% (2816/627,024) of the total sample data. One of the 12 papers commented on the analysis of accuracy of the tool used.
conclusionsMultiple methods are used for sentiment analysis of tweets in the health care setting. These range from self-produced basic categorizations to more complex and expensive commercial software. The open source and commercial methods are developed on product reviews and generic social media messages. None of these methods have been extensively tested against a corpus of health care messages to check their accuracy. This study suggests that there is a need for an accurate and tested tool for sentiment analysis of tweets trained using a health care setting-specific corpus of manually annotated tweets first.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.