ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2018
Use and Disclosure of Complementary Health Approaches in US Adults With Cardiovascular Disease.
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-physician communication on herbal medicine use during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ global health · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of transcendental meditation on depressive symptoms and blood pressure in adults with cardiovascular disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Complementary therapies in medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Varieties of silence - a mixed-methods study exploring reasons and justifications for nondisclosure of the use of complementary therapies to physicians in Finland.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- In the Turkish News: Coronavirus and "Alternative & complementary" medicine methods.Complementary therapies in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence indicates that use of Complementary Health Approaches (CHAs) is common in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and has benefits and risks. Yet, disclosure of CHA use to physicians is not uniformly high. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence and patterns of CHA use and disclosure in patients with CVD in a nationally representative US sample. Use of specific CHA modalities and the predictors and reasons for nondisclosure were examined. In the 2012 National Health Interview Survey, a nationally representative sample of adults aged 18+ was used, and 12,364 patients who reported being diagnosed with CVD were analyzed using weighted bivariate and logistic regression. Analyses revealed that 34.75% of patients with CVD had used CHA in the previous year. Women, those with higher education and income, who had functional limitations, greater mental distress, and healthier lifestyles were significantly more likely to use CHA. Nonvitamin, nonmineral supplements was the most prevalent CHA used (19.22%). Rates of nondisclosure were highest among younger and better educated CHA users. In patients with CVD who did not disclose CHA use to their physician (33.67%), 45.51% said the reason was because physician did not ask; 8.75% said the reason was because they were not using CHA at the time. In conclusion, over 1/3 of patients with CVD used CHA in the previous year, and nonvitamin, nonmineral supplements were the most commonly used modality. The findings underscore the importance of provider-initiated communication about CHA use in patients with CVD to minimize the potentially harmful consequences of nondisclosure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.