Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29685458›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2018

Prevalence of drug-resistant tuberculosis and imputed burden in South Africa: a national and sub-national cross-sectional survey.

Nazir Ahmed Ismail, Lindiwe Mvusi, Ananta Nanoo, Andries Dreyer, Shaheed V Omar, Sanni Babatunde, Thabo Molebatsi, Martie van der Walt, Adeboye Adelekan, Varough Deyde and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Cost-effectiveness of community tuberculosis screening in South Africa.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genomic characterization of drug-resistantFrontiers in tuberculosis · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rifampicin-resistantJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nazir Ahmed IsmailNational Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa. Electronic address: nazir.ismail@gmail.com.
Lindiwe MvusiNational Department of Health, Tuberculosis Cluster, Pretoria, South Africa.
Ananta NanooNational Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Andries DreyerNational Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Shaheed V OmarNational Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sanni BabatundeWorld Health Organization-South Africa Mission, Pretoria, South Africa.
Thabo MolebatsiNational Department of Health, Tuberculosis Cluster, Pretoria, South Africa.
Martie van der WaltMedical Research Council, Tuberculosis Platform, Pretoria, South Africa.
Adeboye AdelekanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Varough DeydeCenters for Disease Control and Prevention South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa.
Chikwe IhekweazuNational Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Shabir A MadhiNational Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; Medical Research Council: Respiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Department of Science/National Research Foundation: Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of the Witwatersrand, Faculty of Health Science, Johannesburg, South Africa.
National Institute for Communicable DiseasesDepartment of Health · ZARespiratory and Meningeal Pathogens Research Unit · ZASouth African Medical Research Council · ZA

Funding

CGH CDC HHS U19 GH000571Intramural CDC HHS CC999999PEPFARWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, per-capita, South Africa reports a disproportionately high number of cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis. We sought to estimate the prevalence of resistance to tuberculosis drugs in newly diagnosed and retreated patients with tuberculosis provincially and nationally, and compared these with the 2001-02 estimates.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was done between June 15, 2012-June 14, 2014, using population proportionate randomised cluster sampling in the nine provinces in South Africa. 343 clusters were included, ranging between 31 and 48 per province. A patient was eligible for inclusion in the survey if he or she presented as a presumptive case during the intake period at a drug resistance survey enrolling facility. Consenting participants (≥18 years old) completed a questionnaire and had a sputum sample tested for resistance to first-line and second-line drugs. Analysis was by logistic regression with robust SEs, inverse probability weighted against routine data, and estimates were derived using a random effects model.

findings101 422 participants were tested in 2012-14. Nationally, the prevalence of MDR tuberculosis was 2·1% (95% CI 1·5-2·7) among new tuberculosis cases and 4·6% (3·2-6·0) among retreatment cases. The provincial point prevalence of MDR tuberculosis ranged between 1·6% (95% CI 0·9-2·9) and 5·1% (3·7-7·0). Overall, the prevalence of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (4·6%, 95% CI 3·5-5·7) was higher than the prevalence of MDR tuberculosis (2·8%, 2·0-3·6; p=0·01). Comparing the current survey with the previous (2001-02) survey, the overall MDR tuberculosis prevalence was 2·8% versus 2·9% and prevalance of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis was 3·4% versus 1·8%, respectively. The prevalence of isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis was above 5% in all provinces. The prevalence of ethionamide and pyrazinamide resistance among MDR tuberculosis cases was 44·7% (95% CI 25·9-63·6) and 59·1% (49·0-69·1), respectively. The prevalence of XDR tuberculosis was 4·9% (95% CI 1·0-8·8). Nationally, the estimated numbers of cases of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis, MDR tuberculosis, and isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis for 2014 were 13 551, 8249, and 17 970, respectively.

interpretationThe overall prevalence of MDR tuberculosis in South Africa in 2012-14 was similar to that in 2001-02; however, prevalence of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis almost doubled among new cases. Furthermore, the high prevalence of isoniazid mono-resistant tuberculosis, not routinely screened for, and resistance to second-line drugs has implications for empirical management.

fundingPresident's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under the terms of 1U19GH000571.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntitubercular AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesExtensively Drug-Resistant TuberculosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisPopulation SurveillancePrevalencePyrazinamideSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesAntitubercular AgentsPyrazinamide

Identifiers

PMID29685458
PMCPMC6800151
OpenAlexW2799717110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.