Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29685170›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2018

Nasal carriage, risk factors and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers in Adigrat and Wukro hospitals, Tigray, Northern Ethiopia.

Haftom Legese, Atsebaha Gebrekidan Kahsay, Amlisha Kahsay, Tadele Araya, Gebre Adhanom, Saravanan Muthupandian, Araya Gebreyesus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Methicillin-ResistantMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nasal Carriage Rate ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. High Levels of Methicillin-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haftom LegeseDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia. legesehaftom2@gmail.com.
Atsebaha Gebrekidan KahsayDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Amlisha KahsayDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Tadele ArayaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Gebre AdhanomDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Saravanan MuthupandianDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.
Araya GebreyesusDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, College of Health Science, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine nasal carriage, risk factors and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among health care-workers of Adigrat and Wukro hospitals Northern Ethiopia.

resultsThe overall prevalence of S. aureus and methicillin resistance S. aureus (MRSA) in the present study were 12% (29/242) and 5.8% (14/242) respectively. The rate of MRSA among S. aureus was 48.3%(14/29). In this study, MRSA carriage was particularly higher among nurse professionals (7.8%) and surgical ward (17.1%). None of the MRSA isolates were sensitive to penicillin and ampicillin. However, low resistance was found for chloramphenicol and clindamycin. Being diabetic and use of hands rub was statistically significant with MRSA colonization.

Indexed as

Staphylococcus aureusAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsEthiopiaFemaleHandHospitalsHumansMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedNasal CavityNursing Staff, HospitalPersonnel, HospitalStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial susceptibility testHealth care workersmethicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureusnasal carriageStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID29685170
PMCPMC5914064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.