Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29685128›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2018

Distributional patterns of item responses and total scores on the PHQ-9 in the general population: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Shinichiro Tomitaka, Yohei Kawasaki, Kazuki Ide, Maiko Akutagawa, Hiroshi Yamada, Yutaka Ono, Toshiaki A Furukawa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface Surgery to Treat Chronic Postamputation Pain: A Prospective Study in Major Lower Limb Amputation Patients.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Language sentiment predicts changes in depressive symptoms.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Major depressive disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Shinichiro TomitakaDepartment of Mental Health, Panasonic Health Center, Landic building 3F, Nishishinbashi 3-8-3, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0003, Japan. tomitaka.shinichiro@jp.panasonic.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7161-6967
Yohei KawasakiClinical Research Center, Chiba University Hospital, 1-8-1, Cho-ku, Chiba-shi, 260-8677, Japan.
Kazuki IdeDepartment of Drug Evaluation and Informatics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, 422-8526, Japan.
Maiko AkutagawaDepartment of Drug Evaluation and Informatics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, 422-8526, Japan.
Hiroshi YamadaDepartment of Drug Evaluation and Informatics, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-ku, Shizuoka, 422-8526, Japan.
Yutaka OnoCenter for the Development of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Training, Shirogane-cho 1-13, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0816, Japan.
Toshiaki A FurukawaDepartment of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
University of Shizuoka · JPBehavior Therapy Associates · USChiba University Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPPanasonic (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, item responses and total scores on depression screening scales have been reported to have characteristic distributions in the general population. The distributional pattern of responses to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in the general population has not been well studied. Thus, we carried out a pattern analysis of the PHQ-9 item responses and total scores in US adults.

methodsData (5372 individuals) were drawn from the 2013-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the United States. The item responses and total score distributions of the PHQ-9 data were investigated with graphical analysis and exponential regression model.

resultsLines of item responses showed the same pattern among the nine items, characterized by crossing at a single point between "not at all" and "several days" and a parallel pattern from "several days" to "nearly every day" on a log-normal scale. The total score distribution of the PHQ-9 exhibited an exponential pattern, except for at the lower end of the distribution.

conclusionsThe present results support that the item responses and total scores on the PHQ-9 in the general population show the same characteristic patterns, consistent with the previous studies using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and Kessler Screening Scale for Psychological Distress (K6).

Indexed as

Nutrition SurveysAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient Health QuestionnaireUnited StatesYoung AdultDepressive symptomExponential distributionItem responseLatent traitNational Health and Nutrition Examination SurveyPatient Health Questionnaire-9Suicide ideation

Identifiers

PMID29685128
PMCPMC5913886
OpenAlexW2805061038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.