ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018
Validation of a self-administered web-based 24-hour dietary recall among pregnant women.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal macronutrient and energy intake during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the INDDEX24 Dietary Assessment Platform in Viet Nam.The British journal of nutrition · 2023Trial
- Validity and Usability of a Smartphone Image-Based Dietary Assessment App Compared to 3-Day Food Diaries in Assessing Dietary Intake Among Canadian Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Reliability and validity of assessing energy and nutrient intake with the Vienna food record: a cross-over randomised study.Nutrition journal · 2019Trial
- Dietary guidelines adherence and pregnancy exposure to 10 classes of priority chemicals: an observational study in the Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes Cohort.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Observational
- Recent Choline Intake Is Inversely Associated with Inflammation in Pregnancy - Evidence from the Canadian APrON Cohort.The Journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Completion Rates for Ecological Momentary Assessments of Food Intake During Pregnancy and Post Partum: Descriptive Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- A cross-sectional comparison of the functionality of the short-form FFQ to a 3-day food intake record completed early in the second trimester of pregnancy.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Validation of an web-based dietary assessment tool (RiksmatenFlex) against doubly labelled water and 24 h dietary recalls in pregnant women.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
- Assessing the relative validity of a web-based self-administered 24-hour dietary recall in a Canadian adolescent's population.Nutrition journal · 2024Article
- Exploring preliminary dietary intake results using a novel dietary assessment tool with pregnant participants enrolled in a birth cohort.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Article
- Maternal and Neonatal Factors Modulating Breast Milk Cytokines in the First Month of Lactation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Relative Validity and Reliability of the Remind App as an Image-Based Method to Assess Dietary Intake and Meal Timing in Young Adults.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Promoting healthy eating in early pregnancy in individuals at risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: does it improve glucose homeostasis? A study protocol for a randomized control trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2023Article
- Association of maternal body composition and diet on breast milk hormones and neonatal growth during the first month of lactation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Validation of the INDDEX24 mobile appThe British journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- Article
- Longitudinal Assessment of Vitamin D Status across Trimesters of Pregnancy.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Article
- Multidimensional Approach to Assess Nutrition and Lifestyle in Breastfeeding Women during the First Month of Lactation.Nutrients · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe use of valid dietary assessment methods is crucial to analyse adherence to dietary recommendations among pregnant women. This study aims to assess the relative validity of a self-administered Web-based 24-h dietary recall, the R24W, against a pen-paper 3-day food record (FR) among pregnant women.
methodsSixty (60) pregnant women recruited at 9.3 ± 0.7 weeks of pregnancy in Quebec City completed, at each trimester, 3 R24W and a 3-day FR. Mean energy and nutrient intakes reported by both tools were compared using paired Student T-Tests. Pearson correlations were used to analyze the association between both methods. Agreement between the two methods was evaluated using cross-classification analyses, weighted kappa coefficients and Bland-Altman analyses.
resultsPearson correlation coefficients were all significant, except for vitamin B
conclusionsCompared to a 3-day FR, the R24W is a valid method to assess intakes of energy and most nutrients but may be less accurate in the evaluation of intakes of fat (as a proportion of energy intake), vitamin D, zinc and folic acid. During pregnancy, the R24W was a more accurate tool at a group-level than at an individual-level and should, therefore, be used in an epidemiological rather than a clinical setting. The R24W may be particularly valuable as a tool used in cohort studies to provide valid information on pregnant women's dietary intakes and facilitate evaluation of associations between diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.