ArticleBMC nephrology2018
Single-marker and multi-marker approaches to appraise the relationships between biomarkers and microalbuminuria in Chinese middle-aged and elderly from communities: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- How Should Anesthesiologists Face Coronavirus Disease 2019?Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Roles for c-Abl in postoperative neurodegeneration.International journal of medical sciences · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnalyzing the relationships between biomarkers representing distinct pathophysiologic pathways and microalbuminuria (MA) can strengthen the identifying ability for renal damage and illuminate previously unrecognized pathways for the pathogenesis of renal damage. The current analysis was to clarify the associations between biomarkers, including N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), homocysteine and uric acid (UA), and MA in Chinese middle-aged and elderly from communities.
methodsAll 839 residents had complete set of these biomarkers and full assessment of MA.
resultsPrevalence of participants with MA was 13.5% (113 participants). Levels of age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), homocysteine and NT-proBNP and proportion of cigarette smoking in participants with MA significantly exceeded those in participants without MA (p < 0.05 for all). In single-marker and multi-marker models of linear and logistic regression analyses, homocysteine and NT-proBNP levels (p < 0.05 for all) rather than hsCRP and UA levels (p > 0.05 for all) were statistically significant in relation to MA. Additionally, no matter which biomarker was directed at, levels of age, SBP and FBG and proportion of cigarette smoking had significant associations with MA. Homocysteine and NT-proBNP levels (p < 0.05 for all) rather than hsCRP and UA levels (p > 0.05 for all) had significant abilities to identify MA.
conclusionBoth single-marker and multi-marker analyses confirmed that homocysteine and NT-proBNP were associated with MA in Chinese middle-aged and elderly from communities after adjustment for multiple confounders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.