Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684982›Full record

ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2018

Intrathecal levobupivacaine versus bupivacaine for inguinal hernia surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Ajay Singh, Anshu Gupta, Priyankar Kumar Datta, Maitree Pandey

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05184465 (Comparison of the Efficacy of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Levobupivacaine, and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Equal Volumes for Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05184465 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of the Efficacy of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Levobupivacaine, and 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Equal Volumes for Spinal Anesthesia in Lower Limb Surgeries

TypeinterventionalSponsorMogilev Regional Clinical HospitalRan2017 to 2022Enrolled111ConditionsAnesthesia, SpinalArmsspinal anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ajay SinghDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1526-5370
Anshu GuptaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Priyankar Kumar DattaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India.
Maitree PandeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INLady Hardinge Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLevobupivacaine is an attractive alternative to racemic bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia due to the lower potential for cardio-toxicity and faster recovery profile. This study was designed to compare isobaric levobupivacaine with hyperbaric racemic bupivacaine with respect to intraoperative quality of anesthesia and the postoperative recovery profile in patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery.

methodsA total of 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists 1 and 2 patients, aged 18-60 years, undergoing elective daycare unilateral inguinal hernia surgery, were randomized into two groups. Group L received spinal anesthesia with 3 ml of 0.5% plain levobupivacaine. Group B received 3 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric racemic bupivacaine. Quality of anesthesia, sensory and motor block characteristics, duration of effective analgesia, time to mobilization, and incidence of side effects were compared.

resultsThe quality of anesthesia was comparable between the two groups. No difference was observed in the block onset time or maximum block height. The duration of anesthesia was significantly shorter in group L compared with that in group B (206.2 ± 18.9 min vs. 224.1 ± 15.6 min, P < 0.001), as was duration of motor block (185.9 ± 20.3 min vs. 196.4 ± 21.2 min, P = 0.016) and time to walk unaided (321.9 ± 19.2 min vs. 356.7 ± 26.6 min, P < 0.001). The incidence of hypotension was less in group L (12%) compared to group B (32%) (P = 0.028).

conclusionsLevobupivacaine is an effective alternative to bupivacaine for patients undergoing unilateral inguinal hernia surgery. It has a shorter duration of sensory and motor block, allowing earlier mobilization in daycare surgeries, and a lower incidence of intraoperative hypotension.

Indexed as

BupivacaineLevobupivacaineSpinal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID29684982
PMCPMC5995016
OpenAlexW2787399125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.