Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684890›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Feasibility of ecological momentary assessment to study mood and risk behavior among young people who inject drugs.

Mary E Mackesy-Amiti, Basmattee Boodram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Negative affect, affect-related impulsivity, and receptive syringe sharing among people who inject drugs.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mary E Mackesy-AmitiUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1603 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: mmamiti@uic.edu.
Basmattee BoodramUniversity of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 1603 W. Taylor St., Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: bboodram@uic.edu.

Funding

Contextual risk factors for hepatitis C among young persons who inject drugsR01DA043484 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI BOODRAM, BASMATTEE · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Emotion Dysregulation and Risky Behavior Among People Who Inject DrugsR21DA039010 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MACKESY-AMITI, MARY ELLEN · 2015 to 2016
$444k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA043484NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA039010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo test the acceptability and feasibility of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of mood and injection risk behavior among young people who inject drugs (PWID), using mobile phones.

methodsParticipants were 185 PWID age 18-35 recruited from two sites of a large syringe service program in Chicago. After completing a baseline interview, participants used a mobile phone app to respond to momentary surveys on mood, substance use, and injection risk behavior for 15 days. Participants were assigned to receive surveys 4, 5, or 6 times per day.

resultsParticipants were 68% male, 61% non-Hispanic white, 24% Hispanic, and 5% non-Hispanic Black. Out of 185 participants, 8% (n = 15) failed to complete any EMA assessments. Among 170 EMA responders, the mean number of days reporting was 10 (SD 4.7), the mean proportion of assessments completed was 0.43 (SD 0.27), and 76% (n = 130) completed the follow-up interview. In analyses adjusted for age and race/ethnicity, women were more responsive than men to the EMA surveys in days reporting (IRR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.56), and total number of surveys completed (IRR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93). Homeless participants responded on fewer days (IRR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.90) and completed fewer surveys (IRR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.91), and were less likely to return for follow-up (p = 0.016). EMA responsiveness was not significantly affected by the number of assigned daily assessments.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated high acceptability and feasibility of EMA among young PWID, with up to 6 survey prompts per day. However, homelessness significantly hampered successful participation.

Indexed as

AffectEcological Momentary AssessmentRisk-TakingSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentAdultCell PhoneChicagoFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSubstance-Related DisordersYoung AdultEcological momentary assessmentEmotion dysregulationHepatitis CHIVHomelessInjection drug useRisk behavior

Identifiers

PMID29684890
PMCPMC5959794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.