Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684795›Full record

ArticleMidwifery2018

Screening for postpartum anxiety: A quality improvement project to promote the screening of women suffering in silence.

Sarah Toler, Susan Stapleton, Kim Kertsburg, Tiffany J Callahan, Marie Hastings-Tolsma

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Midwifery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Perinatal Depressive Symptoms among Pregnant Employees in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah TolerLouise Herrington School of Nursing, Baylor University, Dallas, TX 75211, United States . Electronic address: sarahannetoler@gmail.com.
Susan StapletonResearch Committee Chair, American Association of Birth Centers, Perkiomenville, PA 180474, United States.
Kim KertsburgLicensed Clinical Social Worker, Dallas Postpartum Support, Dallas, TX 75231, United States. Electronic address: kim@dallaspps.com.
Tiffany J CallahanComputational Bioscience, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. Electronic address: tiffany.callahan@ucdenver.edu.
Marie Hastings-TolsmaLouise Herrington School of Nursing, Baylor University, Dallas, TX 75246, United States . Electronic address: Marie_Hastings-Tolsma@baylor.edu.
Baylor University · USParker University · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

Computational Bioscience Program Training GrantT15LM009451 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katherina Kechris-Mays, Arjun Krishnan · 2007 to 2026
$11.7M
NLM NIH HHS T15 LM009451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum anxiety is a mental health problem that has largely been ignored by maternity care providers despite an estimated incidence as high as 28.9%. Though postpartum anxiety may or may not be accompanied by depression, and while screening for postpartum depression has become more common place, postpartum anxiety is often not assessed or addressed. PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot quality improvement project was to implement a screening, treatment and referral program for postpartum anxiety in the birth centre environment. PROCEDURES: Midwives from 10 geographically diverse birth centres, and all members of the American Association of Birth Centres, were recruited to participate in the project. An online video was developed which detailed postpartum anxiety, screening through use of the anxiety subscale of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and a toolkit for treatment and/or referral for screen positive patients. Participants entered patient scores into the Perinatal Data Registry of the American Association of Birth Centres. Individual interviews of midwives were conducted following the 10-week pilot period. MAIN

findingsThere were a total of 387 participants across 9 participating sites. Among all screened participants with follow-up data, (n = 382), 9.69% (n = 37) were lost to follow-up. Among all participants screened with the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale -3A and Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (n = 318), 12.58% (n = 40) had a positive Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale -3A score of greater than six. Of all screened participants with an Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale score, 15 (6.98%) had a Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale score of less than 12 and an Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale -3A score greater than six, and would have not received follow up care if only screened for postpartum depression. Midwife participants expressed heightened awareness of the need to screen and felt screening was easy to integrate into clinical practice.

conclusionsThe Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale -3A is a valid, easy-to-use tool which should be considered for use in clinical practice. Modification of the electronic health record can serve as an important impetus triggering screening and treatment. It is important that clinicians are educated on the prevalence of postpartum anxiety, its risk factors, symptoms and implications.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyBirthing CentersFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrevalencePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsQuality ImprovementRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesPostpartum anxietyPostpartum depressionPostpartum mental healthPostpartum mood disordersPostpartum periodPostpartum screening

Identifiers

PMID29684795
PMCPMC8040026
OpenAlexW2796425210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.