Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684790›Full record

SynthesisClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2018

Is there evidence to use kinematic/kinetic measures clinically in low back pain patients? A systematic review.

Enrica Papi, Anthony M J Bull, Alison H McGregor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06276322 (Assessment and Comparison of All Spinal Segments Kinematics ın Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Asymptomatic Individuals ın Three Planes During Activities of Daily Living), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06276322 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Assessment and Comparison of All Spinal Segments Kinematics ın Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Asymptomatic Individuals ın Three Planes During Activities of Daily Living

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled46ConditionsLow Back PainArmsLow back pain group, Healthy group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Experimentally measured lumbar skin strains during functional movements.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Enrica PapiDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: e.papi@imperial.ac.uk.
Anthony M J BullDepartment of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Alison H McGregorDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

Arthritis Research UK 20665Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, there is a widespread reliance on self-reported questionnaires to assess low back pain patients. However, it has been suggested that objective measures of low back pain patients' functional status should be used to aid clinical assessment. The aim of this study is to systematically review which kinematic /kinetic parameters have been used to assess low back pain patients against healthy controls and to propose clinical kinematic/kinetic measures.

methodsPubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. Reference lists of selected studies and hand searches were performed. Studies had to compare people with and without non-specific low back pain while performing functional tasks and report body segment/joint kinematic and/or kinetic data. Two reviewers independently identified relevant papers.

findingsSixty-two studies were included. Common biases identified were lack of assessor blinding and sample size calculation, use of samples of convenience, and poor experimental protocol standardization. Studies had small sample sizes. Range of motion maneuvers were the main task performed (33/62). Kinematic/kinetic data of different individual or combination of body segments/joints were reported among the studies, commonest was to assess the hip joint and lumbar segment motion (13/62). Only one study described full body movement. The most commonly reported outcome was range of motion. Statistically significant differences between controls and low back pain groups were reported for different outcomes among the studies. Moreover, when the same outcome was reported disagreements were noted.

interpretationThe literature to date offers limited and inconsistent evidence of kinematic/kinetic measures in low back pain patients that could be used clinically.

Indexed as

Biomechanical PhenomenaHip JointHumansKineticsLow Back PainLumbosacral RegionPelvisRange of Motion, ArticularReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesFunctional assessmentLow back painMotion analysisMovementObjective measure

Identifiers

PMID29684790
PMCPMC6161016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.