Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684641›Full record

ReviewMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2018

Methodological considerations for the identification of choline and carnitine-degrading bacteria in the gut.

Eleanor Jameson, Mussa Quareshy, Yin Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Urine and FecalMetabolites · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eleanor JamesonThe University of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, United Kingdom. Electronic address: eleanor.jameson@warwick.ac.uk.
Mussa QuareshyThe University of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, United Kingdom.
Yin ChenThe University of Warwick, School of Life Sciences, United Kingdom.
University of Warwick · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M017982/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial formation of trimethylamine (TMA) has been linked to cardiovascular disease. This review focuses on the methods employed to investigate the identity of the bacteria responsible for the formation of TMA from dietary choline and carnitine in the human gut. Recent studies have revealed the metabolic pathways responsible for bacterial TMA production, primarily the anaerobic glycyl radical-containing, choline-TMA lyase, CutC and the aerobic carnitine monooxygenase, CntA. Identification of these enzymes has enabled bioinformatics approaches to screen both human-associated bacterial isolate genomes and whole gut metagenomes to determine which bacteria are responsible for TMA formation in the human gut. We centre on several key methodological aspects for identifying the TMA-producing bacteria and report how these pathways can be identified in human gut microbiota through bioinformatics analysis of available bacterial genomes and gut metagenomes.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceCardiovascular DiseasesCarnitineCholineComputational BiologyDietGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansKlebsiella pneumoniaeMethylaminesProteus mirabilisCarnitineCholineMethylaminestrimethylamine

Identifiers

PMID29684641
PMCPMC6200775
OpenAlexW2800130846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.