Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684223›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2018

Socioeconomic disadvantage across the life-course and oral health in older age: findings from a longitudinal study of older British men.

Sheena E Ramsay, Efstathios Papachristou, Richard G Watt, Lucy T Lennon, A Olia Papacosta, Peter H Whincup, S Goya Wannamethee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Water fluoridation, functional dentition and tooth loss in Brazilian adults: a multilevel analysis of SB Brasil 2023.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Disparities in Access to Oral Health Care.Annual review of public health · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheena E RamsayInstitute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, The Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Efstathios PapachristouPsychology & Human Development, Institute of Education, UCL, London, UK.
Richard G WattDepartment of Epidemiology & Public Health UCL, London, UK.
Lucy T LennonInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London, UK.
A Olia PapacostaInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London, UK.
Peter H WhincupPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
S Goya WannametheeInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, UCL, London, UK.
University College London · GBInstitute of Development Studies · GBSt George's, University of London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/09/024/26857British Heart Foundation RG/08/013/25942British Heart Foundation RG/13/16/30528Medical Research Council G1002391The Dunhill Medical Trust R396/1114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The influence of life-course socioeconomic disadvantage on oral health at older ages is not well-established. We examined the influence of socioeconomic factors in childhood, middle-age and older age on oral health at older ages, and tested conceptual life-course models (sensitive period, accumulation of risk, social mobility) to determine which best described observed associations. Methods: A representative cohort of British men aged 71-92 in 2010-12 included socioeconomic factors in childhood, middle-age and older age. Oral health assessment at 71-92 years (n = 1622) included tooth count, periodontal disease and self-rated oral health (excellent/good, fair/poor) (n = 2147). Life-course models (adjusted for age and town of residence) were compared with a saturated model using Likelihood-ratio tests. Results: Socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood, middle-age and older age was associated with complete tooth loss at 71-92 years-age and town adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) were 1.39 (1.02-1.90), 2.26 (1.70-3.01), 1.83 (1.35-2.49), respectively. Socioeconomic disadvantage in childhood and middle-age was associated with poor self-rated oral health; adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) were 1.48 (1.19-1.85) and 1.45 (1.18-1.78), respectively. A sensitive period for socioeconomic disadvantage in middle-age provided the best model fit for tooth loss, while accumulation of risk model was the strongest for poor self-rated oral health. None of the life-course models were significant for periodontal disease measures. Conclusion: Socioeconomic disadvantage in middle-age has a particularly strong influence on tooth loss in older age. Poor self-rated oral health in older age is influenced by socioeconomic disadvantage across the life-course. Addressing socioeconomic factors in middle and older ages are likely to be important for better oral health in later life.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsHumansLikelihood FunctionsLongitudinal StudiesMaleOral HealthPeriodontal DiseasesSocioeconomic FactorsTooth LossUnited KingdomVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID29684223
PMCPMC6540288
OpenAlexW2799886114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.