Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684135›Full record

ReviewAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2018

On the Usefulness of Narratives: An Interdisciplinary Review and Theoretical Model.

Victoria A Shaffer, Elizabeth S Focella, Andrew Hathaway, Laura D Scherer, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Social Media Health Information Formats and Endometriosis Treatment-Seeking Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. The Impact of 4 Risk Communication Interventions on Cancer Screening Preferences and Knowledge.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Using Narratives to Correct Forecasting Errors in Pediatric Tracheostomy Decision Making.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2021
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria A ShafferDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Elizabeth S FocellaDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, WI.
Andrew HathawayDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Laura D SchererDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Brian J Zikmund-FisherDepartment of Health Education and Health Behavior, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine (CBSSM), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Funding

Sequencing, Analysis, and Interpretation of SequencingUM1HG006508 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PIENTA, KENNETH J., ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2013 to 2016
$7.8M
Optimizing Display of Blood Pressure Data to Support Clinical Decision MakingR01HS023328 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI KOOPMAN, RICHELLE J · 2015 to 2019
$2.2M
Systematic Design of Meaningful Presentations of Medical Test Data for PatientsR01HS021681 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZIKMUND-FISHER, BRIAN J · 2013 to 2015
$1.5M
AHRQ HHS R01 HS021681AHRQ HHS R01 HS023328NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG006508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: How can we use stories from other people to promote better health experiences, improve judgments about health, and increase the quality of medical decisions without introducing bias, systematically persuading the listeners to change their attitudes, or altering behaviors in nonoptimal ways? More practically, should narratives be used in health education, promotion, or behavior change interventions? Method: In this article, we address these questions by conducting a narrative review of a diverse body of literature on narratives from several disciplines to gain a better understanding about what narratives do, including their role in communication, engagement, recall, persuasion, and health behavior change. We also review broad theories about information processing and persuasion from psychology and more specific models about narrative messaging found in the health communication and marketing literatures to provide insight into the processes by which narratives have their effect on health behavior. Results: To address major gaps in our theoretical understanding about how narratives work and what effects they will have on health behavior, we propose the Narrative Immersion Model, whose goal is to identify the parameters that predict the specific impact of a particular narrative (e.g. persuade, inform, comfort, etc.) based on the type of narrative message (e.g. process, experience, or outcome narrative). Further, the Narrative Immersion Model describes the magnitude of the effect as increasing through successive layers of engagement with the narrative: interest, identification, and immersion. Finally, the Narrative Immersion Model identifies characteristics of the narrative intervention that encourage greater immersion within a given narrative. Conclusions: We believe there are important communication gaps in areas areas of behavioral medicine that could be addressed with narratives; however, more work is needed in order to employ narrative messaging systematically. The Narrative Immersion Model advances our theoretical understanding about narrative processing and its subsequent effects on knowledge, attitudes, and behavior.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorModels, TheoreticalPersonal Narratives as TopicPersuasive CommunicationBehavioral MedicineHealth PromotionHumans

Identifiers

PMID29684135
PMCPMC6369912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.