Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684132›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2018

Prefrontal Cortical Activity During the Stroop Task: New Insights into the Why and the Who of Real-World Risky Sexual Behavior.

Emily Barkley-Levenson, Feng Xue, Vita Droutman, Lynn C Miller, Benjamin J Smith, David Jeong, Zhong-Lin Lu, Antoine Bechara, Stephen J Read

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neural Bases of Affect-Based Impulsivity: A Decision Neuroscience Account.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Introducing the Glutamate-Amplifies-Noradrenergic-Effects (GANE) Model to the Neurocognitive Study of Emotion-Related Impulsivity.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily Barkley-LevensonDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Feng XueDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vita DroutmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lynn C MillerDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Benjamin J SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
David JeongUSC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Zhong-Lin LuDepartment of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Antoine BecharaDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Stephen J ReadDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Risky Sexual Decision-Making in METH and non-METH Using MSMR01DA031626 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI READ, STEPHEN J · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Research suggests that deficits in both executive functioning and trait impulsivity may play a role in risky sexual behavior. At the neural level, differences in regulation of the prefrontal cortex have been linked to impulsivity, measured neurocognitively and through self-report. The relationship between neurocognitive measures of executive control and trait impulsivity in predicting risky sexual behavior has not been investigated. Purpose: To investigate the relationship between neural functioning during the Stroop task and risky sexual behavior, as well as the effect of individual differences in urgent (positive and negative) impulsivity on this relationship. Methods: A total of 105 sexually active men who have sex with men completed the Stroop task during functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning. They also completed impulsivity inventories and self-reported their risky sexual behavior (events of condomless anal sex in the last 90 days). Results: Risky participants had greater activation than safe participants during the color congruent condition of the Stroop task in anterior cingulate cortex/dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, left frontal pole, and right insula. Across these regions, this neural activation mediated the link between (positive and/or negative) urgent impulsivity and risky sexual behavior. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the brains of men who engage in risky sexual behavior may employ a different distribution of cognitive resources during tasks of executive functioning than men who practice safe sex, and that this may relate to differences in the prefrontal cortical/fronto-insular system responsible for impulse control.

Indexed as

Homosexuality, MaleRisk-TakingAdolescentAdultBrain MappingExecutive FunctionHumansImpulsive BehaviorMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePrefrontal CortexSexual BehaviorStroop TestYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29684132
PMCPMC5916767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.