Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684099›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018

Comparative analysis of tissue reconstruction algorithms for 3D histology.

Kimmo Kartasalo, Leena Latonen, Jorma Vihinen, Tapio Visakorpi, Matti Nykter, Pekka Ruusuvuori

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Three-dimensional histology reveals dissociable human hippocampal long-axis gradients of Alzheimer's pathology.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kimmo KartasaloFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Leena LatonenFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Jorma VihinenFaculty of Engineering Sciences, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland.
Tapio VisakorpiFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Matti NykterFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Pekka RuusuvuoriFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Digital pathology enables new approaches that expand beyond storage, visualization or analysis of histological samples in digital format. One novel opportunity is 3D histology, where a three-dimensional reconstruction of the sample is formed computationally based on serial tissue sections. This allows examining tissue architecture in 3D, for example, for diagnostic purposes. Importantly, 3D histology enables joint mapping of cellular morphology with spatially resolved omics data in the true 3D context of the tissue at microscopic resolution. Several algorithms have been proposed for the reconstruction task, but a quantitative comparison of their accuracy is lacking. Results: We developed a benchmarking framework to evaluate the accuracy of several free and commercial 3D reconstruction methods using two whole slide image datasets. The results provide a solid basis for further development and application of 3D histology algorithms and indicate that methods capable of compensating for local tissue deformation are superior to simpler approaches. Availability and implementation: Code: https://github.com/BioimageInformaticsTampere/RegBenchmark. Whole slide image datasets: http://urn.fi/urn: nbn: fi: csc-kata20170705131652639702. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHistological TechniquesImaging, Three-Dimensional

Identifiers

PMID29684099
PMCPMC6129300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.