Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684059›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2018

Supervised machine learning reveals introgressed loci in the genomes of Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Daniel R Schrider, Julien Ayroles, Daniel R Matute, Andrew D Kern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pervasive effects ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neural posterior estimation for population genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Rapid evolution and comparative analysis of piRNA clusters inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Extremely Randomized Trees to Determine Binding Affinity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel R SchriderDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-4151
Julien AyrolesEcology and Evolutionary Biology Department, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.
Daniel R MatuteBiology Department, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-602X
Andrew D KernDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, United States of America.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USPrinceton University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Emily S Barrett · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
The Population Genetics of DivergenceR01GM078204 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HEY, EMANUEL · 2007 to 2016
$1.7M
The prevalence of genetic introgression in speciationR01GM121750 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MATUTE, DANIEL · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
POPULATION GENOMICS OF ADAPTATIONR01GM117241 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI KERN, ANDREW D · 2017 to 2020
$1.2M
Inferring selection from human population genomic dataK99HG008696 · NHGRI · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI SCHRIDER, DANIEL R · 2016 to 2017
$121k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG008696NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078204NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117241NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hybridization and gene flow between species appears to be common. Even though it is clear that hybridization is widespread across all surveyed taxonomic groups, the magnitude and consequences of introgression are still largely unknown. Thus it is crucial to develop the statistical machinery required to uncover which genomic regions have recently acquired haplotypes via introgression from a sister population. We developed a novel machine learning framework, called FILET (Finding Introgressed Loci via Extra-Trees) capable of revealing genomic introgression with far greater power than competing methods. FILET works by combining information from a number of population genetic summary statistics, including several new statistics that we introduce, that capture patterns of variation across two populations. We show that FILET is able to identify loci that have experienced gene flow between related species with high accuracy, and in most situations can correctly infer which population was the donor and which was the recipient. Here we describe a data set of outbred diploid Drosophila sechellia genomes, and combine them with data from D. simulans to examine recent introgression between these species using FILET. Although we find that these populations may have split more recently than previously appreciated, FILET confirms that there has indeed been appreciable recent introgression (some of which might have been adaptive) between these species, and reveals that this gene flow is primarily in the direction of D. simulans to D. sechellia.

Indexed as

Genome, InsectSupervised Machine LearningAnimalsComputer SimulationDrosophilaDrosophila simulansEvolution, MolecularGene FlowGenetic SpeciationGenetics, PopulationGenetic VariationHaplotypesHybridization, GeneticModels, GeneticSoftwareSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID29684059
PMCPMC5933812
OpenAlexW2949851869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.