Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684039›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Development and validation of brain target controlled infusion of propofol in mice.

Brenna P Shortal, Sarah L Reitz, Adeeti Aggarwal, Qing C Meng, Andrew R McKinstry-Wu, Max B Kelz, Alex Proekt

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brenna P ShortalDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8690-2106
Sarah L ReitzDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Adeeti AggarwalDepartment of Neuroscience, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Qing C MengDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Andrew R McKinstry-WuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Max B KelzDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Alex ProektDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

OptoanesthesiaR01GM107117 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KELZ, MAX · 2014 to 2017
$1.3M
Neurophysiological Basis of General AnesthesiaK08GM106144 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PROEKT, ALEXANDER · 2013 to 2016
$739k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM106144NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107117NIH HHS 7K08GM106144NIH HHS GM107117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanisms through which anesthetics disrupt neuronal activity are incompletely understood. In order to study anesthetic mechanisms in the intact brain, tight control over anesthetic pharmacology in a genetically and neurophysiologically accessible animal model is essential. Here, we developed a pharmacokinetic model that quantitatively describes propofol distribution into and elimination out of the brain. To develop the model, we used jugular venous catheters to infuse propofol in mice and measured propofol concentration in serial timed brain and blood samples using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). We then used adaptive fitting procedures to find parameters of a three compartment pharmacokinetic model such that all measurements collected in the blood and in the brain across different infusion schemes are fit by a single model. The purpose of the model was to develop target controlled infusion (TCI) capable of maintaining constant brain propofol concentration at the desired level. We validated the model for two different targeted concentrations in independent cohorts of experiments not used for model fitting. The predictions made by the model were unbiased, and the measured brain concentration was indistinguishable from the targeted concentration. We also verified that at the targeted concentration, state of anesthesia evidenced by slowing of the electroencephalogram and behavioral unresponsiveness was attained. Thus, we developed a useful tool for performing experiments necessitating use of anesthetics and for the investigation of mechanisms of action of propofol in mice.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, IntravenousInfusion PumpsAnimalsBrainCentral Venous CathetersDrug Delivery SystemsInfusions, IntravenousJugular VeinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, BiologicalPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID29684039
PMCPMC5912730
OpenAlexW2799538084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.