Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684008›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

DIVERSITY in binding, regulation, and evolution revealed from high-throughput ChIP.

Sneha Mitra, Anushua Biswas, Leelavati Narlikar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Algorithm for Reversible Jump Inference of Motifs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. eLife · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Genome-Wide Binding Profile for Human RE1 Silencing Transcription Factor Unveils a Unique Genetic Circuitry in Hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sneha MitraDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India.
Anushua BiswasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India.
Leelavati NarlikarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6820-1878
National Chemical Laboratory · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance 500188-Z-11-ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide in vivo protein-DNA interactions are routinely mapped using high-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). ChIP-reported regions are typically investigated for enriched sequence-motifs, which are likely to model the DNA-binding specificity of the profiled protein and/or of co-occurring proteins. However, simple enrichment analyses can miss insights into the binding-activity of the protein. Note that ChIP reports regions making direct contact with the protein as well as those binding through intermediaries. For example, consider a ChIP experiment targeting protein X, which binds DNA at its cognate sites, but simultaneously interacts with four other proteins. Each of these proteins also binds to its own specific cognate sites along distant parts of the genome, a scenario consistent with the current view of transcriptional hubs and chromatin loops. Since ChIP will pull down all X-associated regions, the final reported data will be a union of five distinct sets of regions, each containing binding sites of one of the five proteins, respectively. Characterizing all five different motifs and the corresponding sets is important to interpret the ChIP experiment and ultimately, the role of X in regulation. We present diversity which attempts exactly this: it partitions the data so that each partition can be characterized with its own de novo motif. Diversity uses a Bayesian approach to identify the optimal number of motifs and the associated partitions, which together explain the entire dataset. This is in contrast to standard motif finders, which report motifs individually enriched in the data, but do not necessarily explain all reported regions. We show that the different motifs and associated regions identified by diversity give insights into the various complexes that may be forming along the chromatin, something that has so far not been attempted from ChIP data. Webserver at http://diversity.ncl.res.in/; standalone (Mac OS X/Linux) from https://github.com/NarlikarLab/DIVERSITY/releases/tag/v1.0.0.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsBayes TheoremBinding SitesChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationComputational BiologyDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEvolution, MolecularHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansNeuronsNucleotide MotifsProtein BindingChromatinDNADNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29684008
PMCPMC5933800
OpenAlexW2952897901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.