Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29684000›Full record

ArticleTransplantation2019

Split Liver Transplantation and Pediatric Waitlist Mortality in the United States: Potential for Improvement.

Emily R Perito, Garrett Roll, Jennifer L Dodge, Sue Rhee, John P Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in surgery · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Organ allocation in pediatric abdominal transplant.Seminars in pediatric surgery · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily R PeritoDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Garrett RollDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Jennifer L DodgeDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Sue RheeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
John P RobertsDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
Metabolic Syndrome after Pediatric Liver Transplant: Causes and ConsequencesK23DK099253 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PERITO, EMILY ROTHBAUM · 2014 to 2018
$938k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK099253NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the United States, 1 in 10 infants and 1 in 20 older children die on the liver transplant waiting list. Increasing split liver transplantation could increase organ availability for these children, without decreasing transplants in adults.

methodsUsing United Network for Organ Sharing Standard Transplant Analysis and Research data, we identified livers transplanted 2010 to 2015 that could potentially have been used for split transplant, based on strict criteria. Livers not suitable for pediatric patients or allocated to high-risk recipients were excluded. Number and distribution of potentially "split-able" livers were compared to pediatric waitlist deaths in each region.

resultsOf 37 333 deceased donor livers transplanted, 6.3% met our strict criteria for utilization in split liver transplant. Only 3.8% of these were actually utilized for split liver transplantation. 96% were used for a single adult recipient. Of the 2253 transplanted as whole livers, 82% of their recipients were listed as willing to accept a segmental liver, and only 3% were listed as requiring a cold ischemia time less than 6 hours. Over the same 5 years, 299 children died on the waitlist. In every United Network for Organ Sharing region, there were more potentially "split-able" livers than pediatric waitlist deaths. Thirty-seven percent of pediatric waitlist deaths occurred at transplant centers that averaged 1 or less pediatric split liver transplantation annually during the study period.

conclusionsThis comparison, although not conclusive, suggests that we might be missing opportunities to reduce pediatric waitlist mortality without decreasing access for adults-using split liver transplant. Barriers are significant, but further work on strategies to increase split liver transplant is warranted.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationTissue DonorsWaiting ListsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolEnd Stage Liver DiseaseFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLiverMalePediatrics

Identifiers

PMID29684000
PMCPMC6773658
OpenAlexW2799517542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.