Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682834›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2019

The nature of delayed dream incorporation ('dream-lag effect'): Personally significant events persist, but not major daily activities or concerns.

Jean-Baptiste Eichenlaub, Elaine van Rijn, Mairéad Phelan, Larnia Ryder, M Gareth Gaskell, Penelope A Lewis, Matthew P Walker, Mark Blagrove

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The influence of intentions on dream content.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effects of Sleep Quality on Dream and Waking Emotions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Baptiste EichenlaubSwansea University Sleep Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Elaine van RijnSwansea University Sleep Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Mairéad PhelanSwansea University Sleep Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Larnia RyderSwansea University Sleep Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
M Gareth GaskellSleep, Language and Memory Laboratory, Department of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Penelope A LewisSchool of Psychology and Cardiff University Brain Imaging Centre, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Matthew P WalkerCenter for Human Sleep Science, Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Mark BlagroveSwansea University Sleep Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-1854
Swansea University · GBCalifornia Center for Sleep Disorders · USCardiff University · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/I037555/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporation of details from waking life events into rapid eye movement (REM) sleep dreams has been found to be highest on the 2 nights after, and then 5-7 nights after, the event. These are termed, respectively, the day-residue and dream-lag effects. This study is the first to categorize types of waking life experiences and compare their incorporation into dreams across multiple successive nights. Thirty-eight participants completed a daily diary each evening and a dream diary each morning for 14 days. In the daily diary, three categories of experiences were reported: major daily activities (MDAs), personally significant events (PSEs) and major concerns (MCs). After the 14-day period each participant identified the correspondence between items in their daily diaries and subsequent dream reports. The day-residue and dream-lag effects were found for the incorporation of PSEs into dreams (effect sizes of .33 and .27, respectively), but only for participants (n = 19) who had a below-median total number of correspondences between daily diary items and dream reports (termed "low-incorporators" as opposed to "high-incorporators"). Neither the day-residue or dream-lag effects were found for MDAs or MCs. This U-shaped timescale of incorporation of events from daily life into dreams has been proposed to reflect REM sleep-dependent memory consolidation, possibly related to emotional memory processing. This study had a larger sample size of dreams than any dream-lag study hitherto with trained participants. Coupled with previous successful replications, there is thus substantial evidence supporting the dream-lag effect and further explorations of its mechanism, including its neural underpinnings, are warranted.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdolescentAdultDreamsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleep, REMYoung Adultautobiographical memorydeclarative memorydreamingmemory consolidationrapid eye movement sleep

Identifiers

PMID29682834
PMCPMC6849581
OpenAlexW2791077245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.