Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682694›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

The American Society of Hematology (ASH) Medical Educators Institute: a Pilot Faculty Development Project for Hematology Educators.

Jennifer C Kesselheim, Charles P Clayton, Josel Fritz, Roy E Smith, Scott D Gitlin, Erin Reid, Kenneth S Zuckerman, Marc J Kahn

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer C KesselheimDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Charles P ClaytonASH, 2021 L Street, NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. cclayton@hematology.org.
Josel FritzTraining and Evaluation, American Society of Hematology, Washington, DC, USA.
Roy E SmithUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Scott D GitlinUniversity of Michigan Health System and Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Erin ReidUC San Diego Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kenneth S ZuckermanMoffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
Marc J KahnTulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinician educators at academic medical centers often lack the community, mentorship, and faculty development to support their missions around education scholarship and teaching. Inadequate support for clinician educators can lead to professional dissatisfaction and slowed academic advancement. In 2014, ASH conducted a needs assessment of medical school hematology course directors, hematology-oncology fellowship program directors, and other ASH members identified as educators to determine this community's desire for faculty development in medical education. These data furthered the development of an annual faculty development program for hematology educators offering an interactive curriculum and support for an educational scholarly project. The needs assessment indicated that over 70% of respondents would be personally interested in a faculty development opportunity for hematology educators and only 11% had previously participated in such a program. A steering committee designed an intervention blending didactics, interactive small group exercises, webinars, mentorship for a scholarly project, 360-degree feedback for each participant, and a forum to discuss common career development goals. Of 42 applicants, 20 participants were chosen for the inaugural workshop. Following successful execution of the workshop, participants reported significant increase in confidence in the knowledge, skills, and attitudes targeted by the curriculum. A series of follow-up webinars have been developed to deliver additional content not covered during the workshop and to continue mentorship relationships. The curriculum will be further refined based on feedback from faculty and participants. Long-term outcome measurement will include tracking all participants' publications and presentations, time to promotion, and involvement in national medical education initiatives.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentProgram DevelopmentAcademic Medical CentersAcademies and InstitutesCurriculumEducation, MedicalFaculty, MedicalFellowships and ScholarshipsHematologyHumansMentorsPilot ProjectsUnited StatesFaculty developmentGraduateHematologyMedical educationUndergraduate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.