Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682683›Full record

ArticleInjury epidemiology2018

Using matrix frame to present road traffic injury pattern.

Chien-Hsing Wang, Wan-Hua Hsieh, Fu-Wen Liang, Tsung-Hsueh Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Injury epidemiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chien-Hsing WangDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Trauma Center, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Hualien, Taiwan.
Wan-Hua HsiehDepartment of Public Health, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.
Fu-Wen LiangDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tsung-Hsueh LuNCKU Research Center for Health Data and Department of Public Health, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan. robertlu@mail.ncku.edu.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough many epidemiological studies have presented road traffic injuries (RTIs) according to the victim's mode of transport, very few have mentioned the mode of transport of the victim's counterparts. We sought to use matrix frame to present the pattern of RTIs based on the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes.

methodsPatients admitted to Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Taiwan, for RTIs from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2016 were included. The numbers and proportions of various crash types of RTIs were presented using a matrix frame. The row margin of the matrix is the second character of ICD-10 codes V00-V79 (victim's mode of transport), and the column margin of the matrix is the third character of ICD-10 codes V00-V79 (mode of transport of victim's counterpart), constituting a 80-cell grid.

resultsIn total, 2727 patients were included. The cell with the highest proportion in the matrix grid was ICD-10 code V23 "motorcycle rider injured in collision with car, pick-up truck or van" (27.0%, 737/2727), followed by that of V27 "motorcycle rider injured in collision with fixed or stationary object" (12.5%, 342/2727) and V28 "motorcycle rider injured in noncollision transport accident" (12.2%, 334/2727). The matrix pattern of RTIs differed with sex and age.

conclusionsBy using the matrix frame, we can easily understand the RTI pattern for different demographic groups and identify the priority crash types.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyPattern of injuryRoad traffic injuriesTransport accidents

Identifiers

PMID29682683
PMCPMC5911434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.