Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682599›Full record

ArticleTechnology2018

Microfluidic flow cytometry: The role of microfabrication methodologies, performance and functional specification.

Anil B Shrirao, Zachary Fritz, Eric M Novik, Gabriel M Yarmush, Rene S Schloss, Jeffrey D Zahn, Martin L Yarmush

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Probing T-cell activation in nanoliter tumor co-cultures using membrane displacement trap arrays.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. High-Efficiency Single-Cell Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anil B ShriraoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599, Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Zachary FritzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599, Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Eric M NovikHurel Corporation, 671, Suite B, U.S. Highway 1, North Brunswick, NJ 08902.
Gabriel M YarmushDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599, Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Rene S SchlossDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599, Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Jeffrey D ZahnDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599, Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Martin L YarmushDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, 599, Taylor Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.

Funding

Bio-MicroElectroMechanical Systems Resource CenterP41EB002503 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TONER, MEHMET · 2004 to 2018
$17.4M
UMDNJ TRAINING GRANT IN BIOTECHNOLOGYT32GM008339 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI YARMUSH, MARTIN L · 1989 to 2019
$6.1M
Portable automated device for rapid venous blood draws and point of care diagnostic analysisR01EB020036 · NIBIB · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI YARMUSH, MARTIN L · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002503NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020036NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry is an invaluable tool utilized in modern biomedical research and clinical applications requiring high throughput, high resolution particle analysis for cytometric characterization and/or sorting of cells and particles as well as for analyzing results from immunocytometric assays. In recent years, research has focused on developing microfluidic flow cytometers with the motivation of creating smaller, less expensive, simpler, and more autonomous alternatives to conventional flow cytometers. These devices could ideally be highly portable, easy to operate without extensive user training, and utilized for research purposes and/or point-of-care diagnostics especially in limited resource facilities or locations requiring on-site analyses. However, designing a device that fulfills the criteria of high throughput analysis, automation and portability, while not sacrificing performance is not a trivial matter. This review intends to present the current state of the field and provide considerations for further improvement by focusing on the key design components of microfluidic flow cytometers. The recent innovations in particle focusing and detection strategies are detailed and compared. This review outlines performance matrix parameters of flow cytometers that are interdependent with each other, suggesting trade offs in selection based on the requirements of the applications. The ongoing contribution of microfluidics demonstrates that it is a viable technology to advance the current state of flow cytometry and develop automated, easy to operate and cost-effective flow cytometers.

Indexed as

Electrochemical DetectionFlorescence-Based DetectionFlow CytometryFlow FocusingImpedance SpectroscopyMicrofluidicsMicropumpMicrovalvesOptical Detection

Identifiers

PMID29682599
PMCPMC5907470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.