Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682542›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Gut Microbial Changes, Interactions, and Their Implications on Human Lifecycle: An Ageing Perspective.

Ravichandra Vemuri, Rohit Gundamaraju, Madhur D Shastri, Shakti Dhar Shukla, Krishnakumar Kalpurath, Madeleine Ball, Stephen Tristram, Esaki M Shankar, Kiran Ahuja, Rajaraman Eri

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03888742 (A Cross Sectional Study to Assess the Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Gut and Urinary Microbiota in Patients With Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03888742 completednot on this map

A Cross Sectional Study to Assess the Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on Gut and Urinary Microbiota in Patients With Prostate Cancer

TypeobservationalSponsorChinese University of Hong KongRan2018 to 2021Enrolled214ConditionsProstate Cancer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ravichandra VemuriSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-426X
Rohit GundamarajuSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.
Madhur D ShastriSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.
Shakti Dhar ShuklaSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5796-0171
Krishnakumar KalpurathRehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Kingston Center, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Madeleine BallSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3082, Australia.
Stephen TristramSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8485-0322
Esaki M ShankarSchool of Basic and Applied Sciences, Central University of Tamil Nadu, Thiruvarur, India.
Kiran AhujaSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0323-4692
Rajaraman EriSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, TAS 7250, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1688-8043
University of Tasmania · AUCentral University of Tamil Nadu · INMonash Health · AURMIT University · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota is established during birth and evolves with age, mostly maintaining the commensal relationship with the host. A growing body of clinical evidence suggests an intricate relationship between the gut microbiota and the immune system. With ageing, the gut microbiota develops significant imbalances in the major phyla such as the anaerobic Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes as well as a diverse range of facultative organisms, resulting in impaired immune responses. Antimicrobial therapy is commonly used for the treatment of infections; however, this may also result in the loss of normal gut flora. Advanced age, antibiotic use, underlying diseases, infections, hormonal differences, circadian rhythm, and malnutrition, either alone or in combination, contribute to the problem. This nonbeneficial gastrointestinal modulation may be reversed by judicious and controlled use of antibiotics and the appropriate use of prebiotics and probiotics. In certain persistent, recurrent settings, the option of faecal microbiota transplantation can be explored. The aim of the current review is to focus on the establishment and alteration of gut microbiota, with ageing. The review also discusses the potential role of gut microbiota in regulating the immune system, together with its function in healthy and diseased state.

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGastrointestinal TractHumansImmune SystemLife Cycle StagesPrebioticsProbioticsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPrebiotics

Identifiers

PMID29682542
PMCPMC5846367
OpenAlexW2790075460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.