Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682510›Full record

ArticlemHealth2018

Do mental health mobile apps work: evidence and recommendations for designing high-efficacy mental health mobile apps.

Pooja Chandrashekar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in mHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04414774 (Assessing the Effectiveness of a CBT-based App in Reducing Suicidal Ideation), which is not on this map. Cited by 137 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04414774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Effectiveness of a CBT-based App in Reducing Suicidal Ideation: An Open Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorShahak YarivRan2020 to 2021Enrolled128ConditionsSuicide IdeationArmsGG-Suicide-Ideation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pooja ChandrashekarSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID29682510
PMCPMC5897664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.