Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682445›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer drugs2017

UPFRONT DPD DEFICIENCY DETECTION TO SECURE 5-FU ADMINISTRATION: PART 2- APPLICATION TO HEAD-AND-NECK CANCER PATIENTS.

Manon Launay, Joseph Ciccolini, Claire Fournel, Carmelo Blanquicett, Charlotte Dupuis, Nicolas Fakhry, Florence Duffaud, Sébastien Salas, Bruno Lacarelle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 5-Fluorouracil Rechallenge After Cardiotoxicity.The American journal of case reports · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Manon LaunayLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique Clinique, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Joseph CiccoliniLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique Clinique, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Claire FournelMedical Oncology Unit, La Timone University hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Carmelo BlanquicettEmory University School of Medicine and Atlanta VA Medical Center, USA.
Charlotte DupuisMedical Oncology Unit, La Timone University hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Nicolas FakhryHead-and-Neck Surgery Unit, La Conception University Hospital of Marseille, Marseille France.
Florence DuffaudMedical Oncology Unit, La Timone University hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Sébastien SalasMedical Oncology Unit, La Timone University hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Bruno LacarelleLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique Clinique, La Timone University Hospital of Marseille, APHM Marseille France.
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRHôpital de la Timone · FRAtlanta VA Medical Center · USHôpital de la Conception · FR

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI MADHAV V DHODAPKAR · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpfront screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency in patients scheduled for 5-FU should help reduce the risk of toxicities by preventive adaptive dosing. Our group has developed a simple functional testing categorizing patients upon their DPD status, i.e. extensive metabolizer (EM) or poor metabolizer (PM) patients, using UH2/U ratio measurement in plasma as a surrogate for DPD activity. 5-FU dosing can then be tailored according to DPD deficiency status.

objectivesWe present here an observational study of this strategy implemented in routine clinical practice when treating head-and-neck cancer patients.

resultsA total of 218 evaluable adult patients were treated with a 5-FU-regimen, with DPD-based adaptive dosing. Among them, 20 (9%) were identified as PM and received subsequently a 20-50% reduced dosing of 5-FU as compared with EM patients (2102 ±254 mg VS. 2577 ±353mg, p<0.001 ttest). Gender (Female) was associated with higher risk for being PM (p=0.01, Pearson's Chi squared test). Overall, early severe toxicities were seen only in 5% of patients, all being EM with standard dosing. Similarly, overall severe toxicities were observed in 12.8% of patients only, both figures being markedly lower than usually reported with standard 5-FU. Despite the average -20% reduction in 5-FU dosing between PM and EM patients, clinical efficacy was not statistically different between the two groups (p = 0.2774, chi-square test).

conclusionThis study shows that 5-FU-related toxicities can be greatly reduced in routine clinical practice by the upfront detection of DPD deficient patients with simple adaptive dosing strategy.

Indexed as

5-FluoroUraciladaptive dosingdihydropyrimidine dehydrogenaseDPD deficiencyefficacyhead and neck cancertoxicity

Identifiers

PMID29682445
PMCPMC5906055
OpenAlexW2748094558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.