ArticleJournal of molecular biomarkers & diagnosis2017
Clinical Validation of a Serum Protein Panel (FLNA, FLNB and KRT19) for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.
Article in Journal of molecular biomarkers & diagnosis, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a disulfidptosis-related prognostic model for colorectal cancer using multi-omics analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Prostate tumor markers: diagnosis, prognosis and management.Genetics and molecular biology · 2024Article
- The Potential of Extracellular Matrix- and Integrin Adhesion Complex-Related Molecules for Prostate Cancer Biomarker Discovery.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- PTEN Protein Phosphatase Activity Is Not Required for Tumour Suppression in the Mouse Prostate.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Clinical utility of a serum biomarker panel in distinguishing prostate cancer from benign prostate hyperplasia.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Differential CircRNA Expression Signatures May Serve as Potential Novel Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Therapeutically actionable PAK4 is amplified, overexpressed, and involved in bladder cancer progression.Oncogene · 2020Article
- Biomarkers That Differentiate Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia from Prostate Cancer: A Literature Review.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
- Article
- High-throughput proteomic analysis of FFPE tissue samples facilitates tumor stratification.Molecular oncology · 2019Article
- Androgen-regulated transcription ofeLife · 2019Article
- A Rich Array of Prostate Cancer Molecular Biomarkers: Opportunities and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Development of a reliable assay to measure glypican-1 in plasma and serum reveals circulating glypican-1 as a novel prostate cancer biomarker.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Identification of 9-Gene Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Related Signature of Osteosarcoma by Integrating Multi Cohorts.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study reports on the development of a novel serum protein panel of three prostate cancer biomarkers, Filamin A, Filamin B and Keratin-19 (FLNA, FLNB and KRT19) using multivariate models for disease screening and prognosis. ELISA and IPMRM (LC-MS/MS) based assays were developed and analytically validated by quantitative measurements of the biomarkers in serum. Retrospectively collected and clinically annotated serum samples with PSA values and Gleason scores were analyzed from subjects who underwent prostate biopsy, and showed no evidence of cancer with or without indication of prostatic hyperplasia, or had a definitive pathology diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Probit linear regression models were used to combine the analytes into score functions to address the following clinical questions: does the biomarker test augment PSA for population screening? Can aggressive disease be differentiated from lower risk disease, and can the panel discriminate between prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia? Modelling of the data showed that the new prostate biomarkers and PSA in combination were better than PSA alone in identifying prostate cancer, improved the prediction of high and low risk disease, and improved prediction of cancer versus benign prostate hyperplasia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.