Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682352›Full record

ArticleBone marrow research2018

Optimization of

Rahul Ashok Gosavi, Sukeshani Salwe, Sandeepan Mukherjee, Ritwik Dahake, Sweta Kothari, Vainav Patel, Abhay Chowdhary, Ranjana A Deshmukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rahul Ashok GosaviDepartment of Zoonosis, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-1111-1633
Sukeshani SalweDepartment of Biochemistry and Virology, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Parel, Mumbai, India.
Sandeepan MukherjeeDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4794-137X
Ritwik DahakeDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4773-5341
Sweta KothariDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel, Mumbai, India.
Vainav PatelDepartment of Biochemistry and Virology, National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health (NIRRH), Parel, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-3238
Abhay ChowdharyDepartment of Microbiology, Grant Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospital, Byculla, Mumbai, India.
Ranjana A DeshmukhDepartment of Virology and Immunology, Haffkine Institute for Training, Research and Testing, Parel, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

12-14 days of culturing of bone marrow (BM) cells containing various growth factors is widely used method for generating dendritic cells (DCs) from suspended cell population. Here we compared flask culture method and commercially available CD11c Positive Selection kit method. Immature BMDCs' purity of adherent as well as suspended cell population was generated in the decreasing concentration of recombinant-murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rmGM-CSF) in nontreated tissue culture flasks. The expression of CD11c, MHCII, CD40, and CD86 was measured by flow cytometry. We found significant difference (

Identifiers

PMID29682352
PMCPMC5842714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.