ReviewFuture science OA2018
Collection of analog series-based scaffolds from public compound sources.
Review in Future science OA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A general approach for retrosynthetic molecular core analysis.Journal of cheminformatics · 2019Article
- Finding Constellations in Chemical Space Through Core Analysis.Frontiers in chemistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimProviding a large and freely available METHODOLOGY: Using a recently introduced computational method, ASB scaffolds with single and multiple substitution sites were systematically isolated from publicly available active compounds. DATA: A total of 23,791 unique ASB scaffolds are made available in an organized and machine-readable form as an open access deposition. For each ASB scaffold, the number of analogs it represents is also provided. NEXT STEPS: The freely available collection of ASB scaffolds will be further analyzed to explore different types of scaffold relationships. The ASB scaffold collection will periodically be updated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.