Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682313›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2018

Systematic assessment of the growth plates of the wrist in young gymnasts: development and validation of the Amsterdam MRI assessment of the Physis (AMPHYS) protocol.

Laura S Kox, Rik B J Kraan, Kees F van Dijke, Robert Hemke, Sjoerd Jens, Milko C de Jonge, Edwin H G Oei, Frank F Smithuis, Maaike P Terra, Mario Maas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Laura S KoxDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rik B J KraanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Kees F van DijkeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Hospital Group Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Robert HemkeDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sjoerd JensDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Milko C de JongeDepartment of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Edwin H G OeiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Frank F SmithuisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maaike P TerraDepartment of Radiology, Amphia Hospital Breda, The Netherlands.
Mario MaasDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center · NLAcademic Center for Evidence-Based Sports Medicine · NLAmphia Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLHealth & Safety in Sports · NLNoordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and validate a protocol for MRI assessment of the distal radial and ulnar periphyseal area in gymnasts and non-gymnasts.

methodsTwenty-four gymnasts with wrist pain, 18 asymptomatic gymnasts and 24 non-gymnastic controls (33 girls) underwent MRI of the wrist on a 3T scanner. Sequences included coronal proton density-weighted images with and without fat saturation, and three-dimensional water-selective cartilage scan and T2 Dixon series. Skeletal age was determined using hand radiographs. Three experienced musculoskeletal radiologists established a checklist of possible (peri)physeal abnormalities based on literature and clinical experience. Five other musculoskeletal radiologists and residents evaluated 30 MRI scans (10 from each group) using this checklist and reliability was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss' kappa. A final evaluation protocol was established containing only items with fair to excellent reliability.

resultsTwenty-seven items were assessed for reliability. Intra-rater and inter-rater agreement was good to excellent (respective ICCs 0.60-0.91 and 0.60-0.78) for four epiphyseal bone marrow oedema-related items, physeal signal intensity, metaphyseal junction and depth of metaphyseal intrusions. For physeal thickness, thickness compared with proximal physis of first metacarpal, metaphyseal intrusions, physeal connection of intrusions and metaphyseal bone marrow signal intensity, intra-rater agreement was fair to excellent (ICC/kappa 0.55-0.85) and inter-rater agreement was fair (ICC/kappa 0.41-0.59). Twelve items were included in the final protocol.

conclusionThe Amsterdam MRI assessment of the Physis protocol facilitates patient-friendly and reliable assessment of the (peri)physeal area in the radius and ulna.

Indexed as

childgymnasticsradiologyreliabilitywrist

Identifiers

PMID29682313
PMCPMC5905740
OpenAlexW2797664183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.