Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682294›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

DuraGraft vascular conduit preservation solution in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of a within-patient randomised multicentre trial.

Walid Ben Ali, Pierre Voisine, Peter Skov Olsen, Hugues Jeanmart, Nicolas Noiseux, Tracy Goeken, Vilas Satishchandran, Filippo Cademartiri, Garry Cutter, Dave Veerasingam and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02272582 nacompletednot on this map

A Study to Evaluate the Use of SOMVC001 (GALA) Vascular Conduit Preservation Solution in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPerrault Louis P.Ran2014 to 2016Enrolled100ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsSOMVC001 Vascular Conduit Solution, Standard of care Heparin-dosed saline
NCT02774824 completednot on this map

A 9-month Extension Study to: A Study to Evaluate the Use of SOMVC001 (GALA) Vascular Conduit Preservation Solution in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG)

TypeobservationalSponsorPerrault Louis P.Ran2015 to 2017Enrolled53ConditionsCoronary Artery Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes after surgical revascularization in diabetic patients.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. The percutaneous coronary angioplasty gets better, but the surgical coronary artery bypass does not stay behind.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 7 countries.

Walid Ben AliDepartment of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada.
Pierre VoisineInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie, Quebec City, Canada.
Peter Skov OlsenDept. of Cardiac Surgery, Rigshopitalet University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hugues JeanmartHôpital du Sacré-Coeur, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Nicolas NoiseuxDepartment of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada.
Tracy GoekenSomahlution Inc, Jupiter, Florida.
Vilas SatishchandranSomahlution Inc, Jupiter, Florida.
Filippo CademartiriCardiovascular Imaging Service SDN IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
Garry CutterUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, UK.
Dave VeerasingamGalway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland.
Craig BrownNew Brunswick Heart Centre, Saint John, Canada.
Maximilian Y EmmertClinic for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Louis P PerraultDepartment of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, Montréal, Canada.
Montreal Heart Institute · CAJupiter (United States) · USHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CAInstitut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec · CASaint John Regional Hospital · CASDN Istituto di Ricerca Diagnostica e Nucleare · ITUniversity Hospital Galway · IEUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remain the most often used conduits in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, they are prone to vein graft disease (VGD) during follow-up, which may compromise clinical outcomes. Injury to the SVG endothelium during harvesting and storage promotes neointimal hyperplasia that can advance to atherosclerosis characterised by SVG failure. This trial investigates the potential benefit of DuraGraft, a novel, one-time intraoperative graft treatment developed to efficiently protect the structural and functional integrity of the vascular endothelium, on the development and progression of VGD in CABG patients. Methods and analysis: This ongoing prospective randomised, double-blinded multicentre trial (NCT02272582/NCT02774824) includes patients undergoing isolated CABG requiring at least two SVGs. It compares the impact of DuraGraft, a novel treatment against VGD versus the Ethics and dissemination: The regional ethics committees have approved the trial. Results will be submitted for publication. Clinical trial identifier: NCT02272582 and NCT02774824.

Indexed as

coronary artery bypass graftingendothelial damage inhibitormyocardial infarctionpatencysaphenous vein graftvein graft failurevein graft treatment

Identifiers

PMID29682294
PMCPMC5905829
OpenAlexW2797353588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.