Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682277›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2018

The Allergic Rhinitis Clinical Investigator Collaborative (AR-CIC): verification of nasal allergen challenge procedures in a study utilizing an investigational immunotherapy for cat allergy.

Helen Neighbour, Mena Soliman, Lisa M Steacy, Pascal Hickey, Beth Forbes, Mark Larché, Anne K Ellis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterizing the symptomatology and pathophysiology of allergic rhinitis using a nasal allergen challenge model - a subset of the allergic rhinitis microbiome study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Development of nasal allergen challenge with cockroach in children with asthma.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helen Neighbour1Divisions of Clinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology, Department of Medicine, Firestone Institute of Respiratory Health, The Research Institute, St. Joe's Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Mena Soliman2Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON Canada.
Lisa M Steacy2Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON Canada.
Pascal HickeyAdiga Life Sciences, Inc, McMaster Innovation Park, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Beth ForbesAdiga Life Sciences, Inc, McMaster Innovation Park, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Mark Larché1Divisions of Clinical Immunology & Allergy and Respirology, Department of Medicine, Firestone Institute of Respiratory Health, The Research Institute, St. Joe's Hamilton and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON Canada.
Anne K Ellis2Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Hospital, Kingston, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0725-2353
Kingston General Hospital · CAMcMaster University · CAPopulation Health Research Institute · CAQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Allergic Rhinitis Clinical Investigator Collaborative (AR-CIC) is a network of experienced Allergic Rhinitis (AR) researchers developing better research tools based on the nasal allergen challenge (NAC). A key objective of such is the ability to detect efficacy in a small population. AR-CIC sought to test its NAC protocol as a secondary objective in two small mechanistic research trials of a novel form of immunotherapy [Cat Peptide Antigen Desensitisation (Cat-PAD)] for which efficacy had previously been demonstrated. The primary objective (not presented here) was to identify potential biomarkers of efficacy for peptide immunotherapy, and this provided an ideal opportunity to corroborate the NAC protocol. We aim to clinically validate the AR-CIC NAC methodology in a pooled analysis of secondary endpoints measured in two open label mechanistic studies of cat allergic participants treated with Cat-PAD.

methodsCat allergic AR sufferers with ongoing cat exposure were included. Participants had to demonstrate a total nasal symptom score (TNSS) of at least 8 (max 12) and/or achieve a reduction in peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) of ≥ 50% during a screening titrated NAC. Eligible participants then underwent a baseline NAC visit with the allergen dose that produced a positive challenge at screening, followed by four monthly injections of 6 nmol Cat-PAD. A follow up NAC visit documented changes in nasal response 1 month following the completion of treatment.

resultsNineteen subjects completed the study protocol in the two studies combined. Four injections of Cat-PAD resulted in a significant reduction in TNSS responses generated via NAC following allergen challenge (15 min

conclusionsThis study supports the validity of the AR-CIC's optimised NAC protocol for conducting research of the potential efficacy of novel therapeutics in multi-centre studies.

Indexed as

Allergic RhinitisCat allergyEpitopeImmunotherapyNasal allergen challengePeptide

Identifiers

PMID29682277
PMCPMC5896125
OpenAlexW2800539271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.