Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682208›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Development of a quantitative pharmacodynamic assay for apoptosis in fixed tumor tissue and its application in distinguishing cytotoxic drug-induced DNA double strand breaks from DNA double strand breaks associated with apoptosis.

Angie B Dull, Deborah Wilsker, Melinda Hollingshead, Christina Mazcko, Christina M Annunziata, Amy K LeBlanc, James H Doroshow, Robert J Kinders, Ralph E Parchment

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Profiling DNA damage in 3D Histology Samples.Medical optical imaging and virtual microscopy image analysis : first International Workshop, MOVI 2022, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 18, 2022, Proceedings. MOVI (Workshop) (1st : 2022 : Singapore) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of Pharmacodynamic Responses to Cancer Therapeutic Agents Using DNA Damage Markers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  16. NCI Comparative Oncology Program Testing of Non-Camptothecin Indenoisoquinoline Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in Naturally Occurring Canine Lymphoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angie B DullClinical Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Program, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Deborah WilskerClinical Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Program, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Melinda HollingsheadBiological Testing Branch, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Christina MazckoComparative Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Christina M AnnunziataWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Amy K LeBlancComparative Oncology Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
James H DoroshowDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis and Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Robert J KindersClinical Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Program, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Ralph E ParchmentClinical Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Program, Applied/Developmental Research Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · USLeidos (United States) · US

Funding

Clinical trials in womens cancersZIABC011584 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ANNUNZIATA, CHRISTINA · 2014 to 2023
$3.1M
Comparative Oncology Trials ConsortiumZIGBC011689 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LEBLANC, AMY · 2016 to 2025
$859k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by cancer therapeutic agents can lead to DNA damage repair or persistent DNA damage, which can induce apoptotic cell death; however, apoptosis also induces DSBs independent of genotoxic insult. γH2AX is an established biomarker for DSBs but cannot distinguish between these mechanisms. Activated cleaved caspase-3 (CC3) promotes apoptosis by enhancing nuclear condensation, DNA fragmentation, and plasma membrane blebbing. Here, we describe an immunofluorescence assay that distinguishes between apoptosis and drug-induced DSBs by measuring coexpression of γH2AX and membrane blebbing-associated CC3 to indicate apoptosis, and γH2AX in the absence of CC3 blebbing to indicate drug-induced DNA damage. These markers were examined in xenograft models following treatment with topotecan, cisplatin, or birinapant. A topotecan regimen conferring tumor regression induced tumor cell DSBs resulting from both apoptosis and direct DNA damage. In contrast, a cisplatin regimen yielding tumor growth delay, but not regression, resulted in tumor cell DSBs due solely to direct DNA damage. MDA-MB-231 xenografts exposed to birinapant, which promotes apoptosis but does not directly induce DSBs, exhibited dose-dependent increases in colocalized γH2AX/CC3 blebbing in tumor cells. Clinical feasibility was established using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsies from a canine cancer clinical trial; γH2AX/CC3 colocalization analysis revealed apoptosis induction by two novel indenoisoquinoline topoisomerase I inhibitors, which was consistent with pathologist-assessed apoptosis and reduction of tumor volume. This assay is ready for use in clinical trials to elucidate the mechanism of action of investigational agents and combination regimens intended to inflict DNA damage, apoptotic cell death, or both.

Indexed as

apoptosisDNA double strand breaksimmunofluorescencemultiplexpharmacodynamic assay

Identifiers

PMID29682208
PMCPMC5908309
OpenAlexW2795041338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.