Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682198›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Blood free-circulating DNA testing by highly sensitive methylation assay to diagnose colorectal neoplasias.

Yutaka Suehiro, Shinichi Hashimoto, Shingo Higaki, Ikuei Fujii, Chieko Suzuki, Tomomi Hoshida, Toshihiko Matsumoto, Yuko Yamaoka, Taro Takami, Isao Sakaida and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Circulating Cell-Free DNA and Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaka SuehiroDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shinichi HashimotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Shingo HigakiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sentohiru Hospital, Ube, Japan.
Ikuei FujiiAjisu Kyoritsu Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Chieko SuzukiAjisu Kyoritsu Hospital, Yamaguchi, Japan.
Tomomi HoshidaDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Toshihiko MatsumotoDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yuko YamaokaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Taro TakamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Isao SakaidaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Takahiro YamasakiDepartment of Oncology and Laboratory Medicine, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Ube, Japan.
Yamaguchi University · JPHiroshima Kyoritsu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although methylated TWIST1 is a biomarker of colorectal neoplasia, its detection from serum samples is very difficult by conventional bisulfite-based methylation assays. Therefore, we have developed a new methylation assay that enables counting of even one copy of a methylated gene in a small DNA sample amount without DNA bisulfite treatment. We performed this study to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of serum DNA testing by the new methylation assay in combination with and without the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. This study comprised 113 patients with colorectal neoplasia and 25 control individuals. For the new methylation assay, DNA was treated in two stages with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes, followed by measurement of copy numbers of hTERT and methylated TWIST1 by multiplex droplet digital PCR. The fecal immunochemical test had a sensitivity of 8.0% for non-advanced adenoma, 24.3% for advanced adenoma, and 44.4% for colorectal cancer, and a specificity of 88.0%. The new assay had a sensitivity of 36.0% for non-advanced adenoma, 30.0% for advanced adenoma, and 44.4% for colorectal cancer, and a specificity of 92.0%. Combination of the both tests increased the sensitivity to 40.0%, 45.7%, and 72.2% for the detection of non-advanced adenoma, advanced adenoma, and colorectal cancer, respectively, and resulted in a specificity of 84.0%. Combination of both tests may provide an alternative screening strategy for colorectal neoplasia including potentially precancerous lesions and colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

colorectal cancerdroplet digital PCRhTERTliquid biopsymethylated TWIST1

Identifiers

PMID29682198
PMCPMC5908299
OpenAlexW2794444875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.