ReviewAnnals of vascular diseases2018
The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.
Review in Annals of vascular diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- New Trends of Personalized Medicine in the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Review
- Low and Oscillatory Wall Shear Stress Is Not Related to Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Time-Resolved 3-Dimensional Phase-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2020Article
- High-frequency murine ultrasound provides enhanced metrics of BAPN-induced AAA growth.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the therapeutic management of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is currently based on the maximum diameter criterion, this has often proved inaccurate and misleading. Conversely, the biomechanical approach, which takes into account the pressure-induced wall stress exerted at every point throughout the aneurysmal surface, has been proven superior in predicting the rupture risk of AAAs, and its value is being increasingly recognized among physicians. More recently, hemodynamic indices, such as flow-induced wall shear stresses, have been indicated as potentially significant determinants of AAA natural history. Ultimately, a statistical model that takes into account all these factors may be relevant for making a sound prediction of the rupture risk of aneurysms and optimizing the management of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.