Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29682024›Full record

ArticleAsian journal of neurosurgery

Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Temozolomide in Gliosarcoma: Is It Enough? Case Series of Seven Patients.

Himanshu Srivastava, Abhinav Dewan, Surender Kumar Sharma, Preety Negi, Ajay Kumar Dewan, Sunil Pasricha, Krati Mehrotra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian journal of neurosurgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prognostic Factors of Gliosarcoma in the Real World: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Himanshu SrivastavaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
Abhinav DewanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
Surender Kumar SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
Preety NegiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Ajay Kumar DewanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
Sunil PasrichaDepartment of Pathology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
Krati MehrotraDepartment of Critical Care, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, Rohini, New Delhi, India.
Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · INChristian Medical College & Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe present our experience of gliosarcoma (GSM) in oncology tertiary care center over the last 5 years. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe carried out a retrospective analysis of seven patients with GSM diagnosed between April 2008 and December 2012. Demographic data, clinicopathological data, treatment strategies employed, details of recurrence, and survival patterns were reviewed.

resultsThe median age at diagnosis was 54 years, ranging between 34 and 63 years with a female predominance (57.1% females). Headache and neurological deficit were the most common symptoms with parietal region being the most common site of lesion. Subtotal resection followed by concurrent chemoradiation therapy was delivered to six patients. The results following completion of planned schedule of concurrent chemoradiotherapy were quite disappointing with two patients having no evidence of disease, one patient was lost to follow-up, and other three had progressive disease. One patient with progressive disease subsequently received eight cycles of bevacizumab on a clinical trial protocol. Fifteen-month posttreatment, she had stable disease on follow-up.

conclusionsOur experience suggests that despite treatment, the diagnosis of GSM portends a poor prognosis and the use of bevacizumab could represent a treatment approach to improve outcome in these patients. Although the role of targeted therapy in GSM remains unclear because of paucity of experience, the treatment decision should be according to patient's performance status, ability, and willingness to receive additional treatment.

Indexed as

Bevacizumabcentral nervous system neoplasmschemoradiotherapygliosarcomaheadacheprognosis

Identifiers

PMID29682024
PMCPMC5898095
OpenAlexW2795058422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.