Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681994›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2018

Bayesian Correction for Misclassification in Multilevel Count Data Models.

Tyler Nelson, Joon Jin Song, Yoo-Mi Chin, James D Stamey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tyler NelsonDepartment of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Joon Jin SongDepartment of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
Yoo-Mi ChinDepartment of Economics, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
James D StameyDepartment of Statistical Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3787-6490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Covariate misclassification is well known to yield biased estimates in single level regression models. The impact on hierarchical count models has been less studied. A fully Bayesian approach to modeling both the misclassified covariate and the hierarchical response is proposed. Models with a single diagnostic test and with multiple diagnostic tests are considered. Simulation studies show the ability of the proposed model to appropriately account for the misclassification by reducing bias and improving performance of interval estimators. A real data example further demonstrated the consequences of ignoring the misclassification. Ignoring misclassification yielded a model that indicated there was a significant, positive impact on the number of children of females who observed spousal abuse between their parents. When the misclassification was accounted for, the relationship switched to negative, but not significant. Ignoring misclassification in standard linear and generalized linear models is well known to lead to biased results. We provide an approach to extend misclassification modeling to the important area of hierarchical generalized linear models.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremModels, StatisticalBiasComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHealth SurveysHumansIndiaPoisson DistributionRegression Analysis

Identifiers

PMID29681994
PMCPMC5845492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.