Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681855›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2018

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Gallic Acid After Oral Administration of Gallic Acid Monohydrate in Normal and Isoproterenol-Induced Myocardial Infarcted Rats.

Zhe Yu, Fan Song, Yu-Chen Jin, Wei-Min Zhang, Ya Zhang, En-Jun Liu, Dan Zhou, Lin-Lin Bi, Qian Yang, Hua Li and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Correlation Analysis ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhe YuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Fan SongDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Yu-Chen JinDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Wei-Min ZhangDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Ya ZhangDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
En-Jun LiuDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Dan ZhouDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Lin-Lin BiDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Qian YangDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Hua LiDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Bang-Le ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Si-Wang WangDepartment of Natural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Air Force Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gallic acid (GA) is a polyphenolic natural product widely distributed in food, beverage, and traditional Chinese herbs with beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system. In this research, a comparative study was conducted to investigate the possible difference of pharmacokinetic process in normal and isoproterenol-induced myocardial infarcted rats after oral administration of GA monohydrate with the dose of 50 and 100 mg/kg, respectively. Quantification of GA in rat plasma was achieved by using a simple and rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic method. The results revealed that pharmacokinetics of GA were greatly different between normal and pathological state. GA exhibited slower absorption into the bloodstream, and yielded 1.7-fold (50 mg/kg GA) and 1.3-fold (100 mg/kg GA) less values of area under concentration-time curve as well as 2.5-fold lower of maximum blood concentration (C

Indexed as

gallic acidHPLCisoproterenolmyocardial infarctionpharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID29681855
PMCPMC5897417
OpenAlexW2796470371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.