Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681822›Full record

ArticleCase reports in oncology

Mullerianosis of the Urinary Bladder: A Case Report.

Rawan Abdul Razack Amir, Khalid M Taheini, Salwa S Sheikh

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uterine Müllerianosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mullerianosis of the urinary bladder; A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Müllerianosis: A Case Report.Journal of endourology case reports · 2019
    Article
  11. Coexistence of malacoplakia and mullerianosis in the urinary bladder: An uncommon pathology.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rawan Abdul Razack AmirImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid M TaheiniConsultant Urologist, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Salwa S SheikhPathology Services Division, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia.
Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mullerianosis is a rare entity consisting of an admixture of 2 or more of the following tissues: endometriosis, endocervicosis, and endosalpingiosis. It most commonly affects the urinary bladder and affects females of fertile age. It presents clinically as hematuria, dysuria, and pelvic pain which may be associated with menstruation. Radiologically and macroscopically, it typically presents as a polypoid mass in the dome or posterior wall of the bladder. Histologically, it consists of glands of varying size lined by endometrial, endocervical, or tubal epithelium. Mullerianosis clinically and histologically mimics other benign and malignant lesions. Herein we report a case of mullerianosis of the urinary bladder. This is a rare lesion with less than 20 cases reported in the literature thus far. We believe raising awareness of this poorly recognized entity is of utmost significance in order to avoid misdiagnosis and the following unnecessary radical procedures.

Indexed as

BladderMullerianosisNeoplasm

Identifiers

PMID29681822
PMCPMC5903129
OpenAlexW2794911259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.