Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681760›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental modelling & software : with environment data news2017

A web-based screening tool for near-port air quality assessments.

Vlad Isakov, Timothy M Barzyk, Elizabeth R Smith, Saravanan Arunachalam, Brian Naess, Akula Venkatram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vlad IsakovU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 109 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27713, USA.
Timothy M BarzykU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 109 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27713, USA.
Elizabeth R SmithU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 109 Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27713, USA.
Saravanan ArunachalamThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute for the Environment, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Brian NaessThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute for the Environment, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Akula VenkatramUniversity of California Riverside, Bourns College of Engineering, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Community model for near-PORT applications (C-PORT) is a screening tool with an intended purpose of calculating differences in annual averaged concentration patterns and relative contributions of various source categories over the spatial domain within about 10 km of the port. C-PORT can inform decision-makers and concerned citizens about local air quality due to mobile source emissions related to commercial port activities. It allows users to visualize and evaluate different planning scenarios, helping them identify the best alternatives for making long-term decisions that protect community health and sustainability. The web-based, easy-to-use interface currently includes data from 21 seaports primarily in the Southeastern U.S., and has a map-based interface based on

Identifiers

PMID29681760
PMCPMC5906819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.