Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681746›Full record

ReviewBreeding science2018

Breeding of lilies and tulips-Interspecific hybridization and genetic background.

Agnieszka Marasek-Ciolakowska, Tomotaro Nishikawa, Daniel J Shea, Keiichi Okazaki

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breeding science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Overexpression of lily MicroRNA156-resistantFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  13. Chromosomal analysis of progenies betweenFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Embryo Rescue in Plant Breeding.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Identification of a Male Sterile Candidate Gene inFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Agnieszka Marasek-CiolakowskaResearch Institute of Horticulture, Department of Applied Biology, Konstytucji 3 Maja 1/3, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland.
Tomotaro NishikawaAgriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Research Council Secretariat, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 1-2-1 Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda, Tokyo 100-8950, Japan.
Daniel J SheaGraduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, 2-Ikarashi, Niigata 950-2181, Japan.
Keiichi OkazakiGraduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, 2-Ikarashi, Niigata 950-2181, Japan.
Niigata University · JPInstytut Ogrodnictwa · PLMinistry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lilies and tulips (Liliaceae family) are economically very important ornamental bulbous plants. Here, we summarize major breeding goals, the role of an integrated method of cut-style pollination and fertilization followed by embryo rescue and mitotic and meiotic polyploidization involved in new assortment development. Both crops have been subjected to extensive interspecific hybridization followed by selection. Additionally, spontaneous polyploidization has played a role in their evolution. In lilies, there is a tendency to replace diploids with polyploid cultivars, whereas in tulip a majority of the cultivars that exist today are still diploid except for triploid Darwin hybrid tulips. The introduction of molecular cytogenetic techniques such as genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) permitted the detailed studies of genome composition in lily and tulip interspecific hybrids and to follow the chromosome inheritance in interspecific crosses. In addition, this review presents the latest information on phylogenetic relationship in lily and tulip and recent developments in molecular mapping using different DNA molecular techniques.

Indexed as

chromosomeGISHinterspecific hybridizationLiliumPhylogenyTulipa

Identifiers

PMID29681746
PMCPMC5903980
OpenAlexW2793744620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.