Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681327›Full record

ReviewInternational review of neurobiology2018

Placebos Without Deception: Outcomes, Mechanisms, and Ethics.

Luana Colloca, Jeremy Howick

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03934138 (Does the Subject's Understanding of Underlying Placebo Mechanisms Compensate for the Loss of Efficacy Associated With the Disclosure of the Use of a Placebo), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03934138 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Does the Subject's Understanding of Underlying Placebo Mechanisms Compensate for the Loss of Efficacy Associated With the Disclosure of the Use of a Placebo

TypeinterventionalSponsorLaboratoire TIMC-IMAGRan2019 to 2020Enrolled126ConditionsAcute PainArmsEducational movie on placebo mechanisms, Informative movie on hand washing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on open-label placebo responses.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luana CollocaSchool of Nursing, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States; School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: colloca@umaryland.edu.
Jeremy HowickUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Chronic orofacial pain: genetics, cognitive-emotional factors, and endogenous modulatory systemsR01DE025946 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI COLLOCA, LUANA · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE025946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific research indicates that open-label and dose-extending placebos (that patients know are placebos) can elicit behavioral, biological, and clinical outcome changes. In this chapter, we present the state-of-the-art evidence and ethical considerations about open-label and dose-extending placebos, discussing the perspective of giving placebos with a rational, as dose extension of active drugs, or expectancy boosters. Previous comprehensive reviews of placebo use have considered how to harness placebo effects in medicine and the need to focus on elements of the clinical encounter as well as patient-clinician relations. Here, we illustrate the similarities and differences between standard (deceptive) placebos, open-label placebos and dose-extending placebos. We conclude that placebos without deception would override ethical barriers to their clinical use. This paves the way to future large-scale, pragmatic randomized trials that investigate the potential of ethical open-label and dose-extending placebos to improve patients' outcomes, and reduce side effects.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnticipation, PsychologicalConditioning, ClassicalDeceptionEthics, MedicalPlacebo EffectHumansConditioningDose-extending placeboExpectancyLearningVerbal suggestions

Identifiers

PMID29681327
PMCPMC5918690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.