Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681286›Full record

ArticleAnalytica chimica acta2018

Hierarchical cluster analysis of technical replicates to identify interferents in untargeted mass spectrometry metabolomics.

Lindsay K Caesar, Olav M Kvalheim, Nadja B Cech

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytica chimica acta, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data Processing and Analysis in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  8. ExploringMarine drugs · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lindsay K CaesarDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Patricia A. Sullivan Science Building, 301 McIver St, 445 Sullivan Science Building, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA.
Olav M KvalheimDepartment of Chemistry, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Nadja B CechDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Patricia A. Sullivan Science Building, 301 McIver St, 445 Sullivan Science Building, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, USA. Electronic address: nadja_cech@uncg.edu.

Funding

Pharmacology CoreU54AT008909 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI PAINE, MARY F · 2015 to 2024
$22.4M
Strategies to Investigate Synergy in Botanical MedicinesR01AT006860 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI CECH, NADJA B · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Predoctoral Training: Innovative Technologies for Natural Products and Integrative Medicine ResearchT32AT008938 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI Nadja B Cech, Jonathan Rodi Chekan · 2016 to 2026
$1.6M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT006860NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT008938NCCIH NIH HHS U54 AT008909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectral data sets often contain experimental artefacts, and data filtering prior to statistical analysis is crucial to extract reliable information. This is particularly true in untargeted metabolomics analyses, where the analyte(s) of interest are not known a priori. It is often assumed that chemical interferents (i.e. solvent contaminants such as plasticizers) are consistent across samples, and can be removed by background subtraction from blank injections. On the contrary, it is shown here that chemical contaminants may vary in abundance across each injection, potentially leading to their misidentification as relevant sample components. With this metabolomics study, we demonstrate the effectiveness of hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) of replicate injections (technical replicates) as a methodology to identify chemical interferents and reduce their contaminating contribution to metabolomics models. Pools of metabolites with varying complexity were prepared from the botanical Angelica keiskei Koidzumi and spiked with known metabolites. Each set of pools was analyzed in triplicate and at multiple concentrations using ultraperformance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). Before filtering, HCA failed to cluster replicates in the data sets. To identify contaminant peaks, we developed a filtering process that evaluated the relative peak area variance of each variable within triplicate injections. These interferent peaks were found across all samples, but did not show consistent peak area from injection to injection, even when evaluating the same chemical sample. This filtering process identified 128 ions that appear to originate from the UPLC-MS system. Data sets collected for a high number of pools with comparatively simple chemical composition were highly influenced by these chemical interferents, as were samples that were analyzed at a low concentration. When chemical interferent masses were removed, technical replicates clustered in all data sets. This work highlights the importance of technical replication in mass spectrometry-based studies, and presents a new application of HCA as a tool for evaluating the effectiveness of data filtering prior to statistical analysis.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCluster AnalysisMass SpectrometryChemical interferentsData filteringDendrogramHierarchical cluster analysisPrincipal component analysisTechnical replicates

Identifiers

PMID29681286
PMCPMC5917943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.