ArticleYearbook of medical informatics2018
Balancing Between Privacy and Patient Needs for Health Information in the Age of Participatory Health and Social Media: A Scoping Review.
Article in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Cervical Cancer Mobile Applications and a Future Directions for Developers.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation, Acceptability, and Actions After Using an AI Workplace Health Kiosk in a Low-Resource Public School Workplace Setting: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- When HIPAA hurts: legal barriers to texting may reinforce healthcare disparities and disenfranchise vulnerable patients.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025Review
- Participant Contributions to Person-Generated Health Data Research Using Mobile Devices: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Article
- The Use of Medical Crowdfunding to Mitigate the Personal Costs of Serious Chronic Illness: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Article
- How Participatory Health Informatics Catalyzes One Digital Health.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Article
- Exploring the Evolution of Social Media in Mental Health Interventions: A Mapping Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Review
- Ten Topics to Get Started in Medical Informatics Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Perspectives on Privacy in the Post-Roe Era: A Mixed-Methods of Machine Learning and Qualitative Analyses of Tweets.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023Article
- Cross-Platform Detection of Psychiatric Hospitalization via Social Media Data: Comparison Study.JMIR mental health · 2022Article
- Sex in the Context of Substance Use: A Study of Perceived Benefits and Risks, Boundaries, and Behaviors among Adolescents Participating in an Internet-Based Intervention.Archives of sexual behavior · 2022Article
- Article
- The risks and benefits of using social media to engage consumers in service design and quality improvement in Australian public hospitals: findings from an interview study of key stakeholders.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Needs assessment for the creation of a community of practice in a community health navigator cohort.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Content and Method of Information for Participants in Clinical Studies With Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs).Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Patients' Willingness to Share Information in Online Patient Communities: Questionnaire Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Research data management in health and biomedical citizen science: practices and prospects.JAMIA open · 2020Article
- Donor information in research and drug evaluation with induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs).Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWith the increased use of participatory health enabling technologies, such as social media, balancing the need for health information with patient privacy and confidentiality has become a more complex and immediate concern. The purpose of this paper produced by the members of the IMIA Participatory Health and Social Media (PHSM) working group is to investigate patient needs for health information using participatory health enabling technologies, while balancing their needs for privacy and confidentiality.
methodsSix domain areas including media sharing platforms, patient portals, web-based platforms, crowdsourcing websites, medical avatars, and other mobile health technologies were identified by five members of the IMIA PHSM working group as relevant to participatory health and the balance between data sharing and patient needs for privacy and confidentiality. After identifying the relevant domain areas, our scoping review began by searching several databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar using a variety of key search terms.
resultsA total of 1,973 studies were identified, of which 68 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Results showed that challenges for balancing patient needs for information and privacy and confidentiality concerns included: cross-cultural understanding, clinician and patient awareness, de-identification of data, and commercialization of patient data. Some opportunities identified were patient empowerment, connecting participatory health enabling technologies with clinical records, open data sharing agreement, and e-consent.
conclusionBalancing between privacy and patient needs for health information in the age of participatory health and social media offers several opportunities and challenges. More people are engaging in actively managing health through participatory health enabling technologies. Such activity often includes sharing health information and with this comes a perennial tension between balancing individual needs and the desire to uphold privacy and confidentiality. We recommend that guidelines for both patients and clinicians, in terms of their use of participatory health-enabling technologies, are developed to ensure that patient privacy and confidentiality are protected, and a maximum benefit can be realized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.