Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29681013›Full record

Trial reportSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2018

The effects of an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation.

Emi Takeuchi, Masashi Kato, Kayoko Miyata, Nao Suzuki, Chikako Shimizu, Hiroshi Okada, Naoko Matsunaga, Mariko Shimizu, Natsuko Moroi, Daisuke Fujisawa and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Educational Program for Healthcare Providers Regarding Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Non-physician's challenges in sexual and reproductive health care provision for women of reproductive age with cancer: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Fex-Talk: a Short Educational Intervention Intended to Enhance Nurses' Readiness to Discuss Fertility and Sexuality with Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emi TakeuchiCenter for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. etakeuch@ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1632-6876
Masashi KatoCenter for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kayoko MiyataConsultation, Counseling and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nao SuzukiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Chikako ShimizuDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi OkadaDepartment of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Naoko MatsunagaConsultation, Counseling and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko ShimizuConsultation, Counseling and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Natsuko MoroiConsultation, Counseling and Support Service Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke FujisawaDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masaru MimuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoko MiyoshiDepartment of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare H26-016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Clinical Practice guidelines recommend that physicians, nurses, social workers, and other health care providers should be prepared to discuss the risk of infertility with patients. We conducted an educational program for non-physician health care providers regarding fertility preservation and evaluated the effects of the educational program.

methodsThe 4-h educational program consisted of lectures about infertility as a potential risk of cancer treatment, fertility preservation, and psychosocial support. Knowledge, confidence, institutional change, and self-practice were assessed pre-program, immediately post-program, and 6 months post-program.

resultsOf 124 participants who joined the program, 74 completed and returned the follow-up survey 6 months after the program. Sixty-one percent of the participants were nurses, 27% were social workers, and 4% were psychologists. The scores for confidence and knowledge increased between pre- and immediate post-program periods (p < 0.01), and between pre- and 6-month post-program periods (p < 0.01). The knowledge score was 52, 76, and 71% at the 3 points respectively. The participants became more likely to disseminate fertility preservation counseling at their institutions (p < 0.01) and use informational resources (p < 0.01). Overall, self-practice and institutional support did not change.

conclusionsThe study revealed that this educational program is applicable for non-physicians to learn about fertility preservation. The participants improved significantly in confidence and knowledge, but not in counseling skills.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEducation, ContinuingFertility PreservationAdultCounselingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHealth PromotionHumansInfertilityMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPhysiciansConfidenceCounselingFertility preservationHealth care providerKnowledge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.