Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29680908›Full record

ArticleInflammation2018

GTS-21 Protected Against LPS-Induced Sepsis Myocardial Injury in Mice Through α7nAChR.

Weilan Kong, Kai Kang, Yang Gao, Haitao Liu, Xianglin Meng, Yanhui Cao, Songliu Yang, Wen Liu, Jiannan Zhang, Kaijiang Yu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Inflammation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Therapeutic Targeting ofPharmacological reviews · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Weilan KongDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Kai KangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Yang GaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 246 Xuefu Road, Harbin, 150086, China.
Haitao LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Harbin, 150081, China.
Xianglin MengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Yanhui CaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Songliu YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Wen LiuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Jiannan ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China.
Kaijiang YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150 Haping Road, Harbin, 150081, China. drkaijiang1@126.com.
Mingyan ZhaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 23 Youzheng Road, Harbin, 150001, China. mingyanzhao1970@163.com.
Harbin Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis-induced myocardial injury is a well-known cause of mortality. The cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway (CHAIP) is a physiological mechanism by which the central nervous system regulates immune response through the vagus nerve and acetylcholine; the α7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) is the main component of CHAIP; GTS-21, a synthetic α7nAChR selective agonist, has repeatedly shown its powerful anti-inflammatory effect. However, little is known about its effect on LPS-induced myocardial injury. We investigated the protective effects of GTS-21 on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced cardiomyopathy via the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway in a mouse sepsis model. We constructed the model of myocardial injury in sepsis mice by C57BL/6 using LPS and determined the time of LPS treatment by hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL). C57BL/6 mice were randomized into five groups: blank control group, model group, α-bungarotoxin + LPS group, GTS-21 + LPS group, and α-bungarotoxin + GTS-21 + LPS group. The pathological results of myocardial tissue were detected by the HE method; the apoptosis rate was detected by the TUNEL method; the relative expressions of NF-κB p65, Caspase-3, Caspase-8, Bcl-2, Bax, p53, and a7nAChR were detected by real-time quantitative PCR (RT-PCR); and the protein expressions of IL-6, IL-1 β, TNF-α, and pSTAT3 were detected by western blot. The results showed that LPS-induced myocardial pathological and apoptosis changes were significant compared with the blank group, which was reversed by GTS-21; however, pretreatment with α-bungarotoxin obviously blocked the protective effect of GTS-21. NF-κB p65, Caspase-3, Caspase-8, Bax, p53, IL-6, IL-1β, TNF-α, and pSTAT3 were significantly increased in the model group, while a7nAChR and Bcl-2 were significantly decreased; GTS-21 treatment reversed that result, while pretreatment with α-bungarotoxin strengthened the result in the model. And pretreatment with α-bungarotoxin blocked the protective effect of GTS-21. GTS-21 can alleviate the LPS-induced damage in the heart via a7nAChR, and pretreatment with α-bungarotoxin obviously blocked the protective effect of GTS-21 on sepsis in mice.

Indexed as

alpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnimalsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsApoptosisBenzylidene CompoundsBungarotoxinsHeart InjuriesLipopolysaccharidesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPyridinesSepsis3-(2,4-dimethoxybenzylidene)anabaseinealpha7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine ReceptorAnti-Inflammatory AgentsBenzylidene CompoundsBungarotoxinsLipopolysaccharidesPyridinesa7nAChRcholinergic anti-inflammatoryGTS-21sepsis

Identifiers

PMID29680908
OpenAlexW2803064254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.