Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29680697›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2018

Regeneration of Cochlear Hair Cells and Hearing Recovery through Hes1 Modulation with siRNA Nanoparticles in Adult Guinea Pigs.

Xiaoping Du, Qunfeng Cai, Matthew B West, Ibrahima Youm, Xiangping Huang, Wei Li, Weihua Cheng, Don Nakmali, Donald L Ewert, Richard D Kopke

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Hair Cell Regeneration: From Animals to Humans.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2024
    Review
  8. Extracellular vesicles for developing targeted hearing loss therapy.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Hearing loss: The final frontier of pharmacology.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Cochlea cell-specific marker expression upon in vitro Hes1 knockdown.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaoping DuHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Qunfeng CaiHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA; Otologic Pharmaceutics Inc., Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Matthew B WestHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Ibrahima YoumHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Xiangping HuangHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA; Otologic Pharmaceutics Inc., Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.
Wei LiHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Weihua ChengHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Don NakmaliHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Donald L EwertHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA.
Richard D KopkeHough Ear Institute, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, USA; Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA; Departments of Physiology and Otolaryngology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA; Otologic Pharmaceutics Inc., Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA. Electronic address: rkopke@houghear.org.
Hough Ear Institute · USOklahoma Medical Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deafness is commonly caused by the irreversible loss of mammalian cochlear hair cells (HCs) due to noise trauma, toxins, or infections. We previously demonstrated that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) directed against the Notch pathway gene, hairy and enhancer of split 1 (Hes1), encapsulated within biocompatible poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA NPs) could regenerate HCs within ototoxin-ablated murine organotypic cultures. In the present study, we delivered this sustained-release formulation of Hes1 siRNA (siHes1) into the cochleae of noise-injured adult guinea pigs. Auditory functional recovery was measured by serial auditory brainstem responses over a nine-week follow-up period, and HC regeneration was evaluated by immunohistological evaluations and scanning electron microscopy. Significant HC restoration and hearing recovery were observed across a broad tonotopic range in ears treated with siHes1 NPs, beginning at three weeks and extending out to nine weeks post-treatment. Moreover, both ectopic and immature HCs were uniquely observed in noise-injured cochleae treated with siHes1 NPs, consistent with de novo HC production. Our results indicate that durable cochlear HCs were regenerated and promoted significant hearing recovery in adult guinea pigs through reversible modulation of Hes1 expression. Therefore, PLGA-NP-mediated delivery of siHes1 to the cochlea represents a promising pharmacologic approach to regenerate functional and sustainable mammalian HCs in vivo.

Indexed as

Hair Cells, AuditoryNanoparticlesRegenerationAnimalsCochleaFemaleGuinea PigsHearingImmunohistochemistryRNA, Small InterferingTranscription Factor HES-1RNA, Small InterferingTranscription Factor HES-1acute acoustic traumacochleaguinea pighair cell regenerationnanoparticleNotch pathwaysiRNA

Identifiers

PMID29680697
PMCPMC5993961
OpenAlexW2792982593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.