Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29680350›Full record

ArticleJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2019

Novel PET and Near Infrared Imaging Probes for the Specific Detection of Bacterial Infections Associated With Cardiac Devices.

Kiyoko Takemiya, Xinghai Ning, Wonewoo Seo, Xiaojian Wang, Rafi Mohammad, Giji Joseph, Jane S Titterington, Colleen S Kraft, Jonathan A Nye, Niren Murthy and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Automated radiosynthesis of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Current cardiology reports · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiyoko TakemiyaEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Xinghai NingUniversity of California at Berkeley, Department of Bioengineering, Berkeley, California.
Wonewoo SeoEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory Center for Systems Imaging, Atlanta, Georgia.
Xiaojian WangUniversity of California at Berkeley, Department of Bioengineering, Berkeley, California.
Rafi MohammadUniversity of California at Berkeley, Department of Bioengineering, Berkeley, California.
Giji JosephEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jane S TitteringtonEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia.
Colleen S KraftEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jonathan A NyeEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory Center for Systems Imaging, Atlanta, Georgia.
Niren MurthyUniversity of California at Berkeley, Department of Bioengineering, Berkeley, California. Electronic address: nmurthy@berkeley.edu.
Mark M GoodmanEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory Center for Systems Imaging, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: mgoodma@emory.edu.
W Robert TaylorEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cardiology Division, Atlanta, Georgia; Emory University School of Medicine and Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: wtaylor@emory.edu.
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

18F Conjugated Maltodextrins for the Detection of Medical Device InfectionsR01EB020008 · NIBIB · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MARK MYRON, MURTHY, NIREN · 2015 to 2018
$2.4M
Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections with MaltodexrinsR43AI114174 · NIAID · MICROBIAL IMAGING, LLC · PI WACH, MICHAEL L · 2015 to 2015
$197k
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 17SDG33410912NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI114174NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to develop imaging agents to detect early stage infections in implantable cardiac devices.

backgroundBacteria ingest maltodextrins through the specific maltodextrin transporter. We developed probes conjugated with either a fluorescent dye (maltohexaose fluorescent dye probe [MDP]) or a F-18 (F18 fluoromaltohexaose) and determined their usefulness in a model of infections associated with implanted cardiac devices.

methodsStainless steel mock-ups of medical devices were implanted subcutaneously in rats. On post-operative day 4, animals were injected with either Staphylococcus aureus around the mock-ups to induce a relatively mild infection or oil of turpentine to induce noninfectious inflammation. Animals with a sterile implant were used as control subjects. On post-operative day 6, either the MDP or F18 fluoromaltohexaose was injected intravenously, and the animals were scanned with the appropriate imaging device. Additional positron emission tomography imaging studies were performed with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose as a comparison of the specificity of our probes (n = 5 to 9 per group).

resultsThe accumulation of the MDP in the infected rats was significantly increased at 1 h after injection when compared with the control and noninfectious inflammation groups (intensity ratio 1.54 ± 0.07 vs. 1.26 ± 0.04 and 1.20 ± 0.05, respectively; p < 0.05) and persisted for more than 24 h. In positron emission tomography imaging, both F18 fluoromaltohexaose and F18 fluorodeoxyglucose significantly accumulated in the infected area 30 min after the injection (maximum standard uptake value ratio 4.43 ± 0.30 and 4.87 ± 0.28, respectively). In control rats, there was no accumulation of imaging probes near the device. In the noninfectious inflammation rats, no significant accumulation was observed with F18 fluoromaltohexaose, but F18 fluorodeoxyglucose accumulated in the mock-up area (maximum standard uptake value 2.53 ± 0.39 vs. 4.74 ± 0.46, respectively; p < 0.05).

conclusionsOur results indicate that maltohexaose-based imaging probes are potentially useful for the specific and sensitive diagnosis of infections associated with implantable cardiac devices.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEarly DiagnosisFluorescent DyesFluorine RadioisotopesInjections, IntravenousMaleOligosaccharidesOptical ImagingPredictive Value of TestsProsthesis-Related InfectionsRadiopharmaceuticalsRats, Sprague-DawleyReproducibility of ResultsFluorescent DyesFluorine RadioisotopesmaltohexaoseOligosaccharidesRadiopharmaceuticalsbacterial imagingmedical device infectionsoptical imagingPET

Identifiers

PMID29680350
PMCPMC6186207
OpenAlexW2801902226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.