Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29680264›Full record

ArticleBone2018

Temporary inhibition of the plasminogen activator inhibits periosteal chondrogenesis and promotes periosteal osteogenesis during appendicular bone fracture healing.

D Bravo, A M Josephson, V Bradaschia-Correa, M Z Wong, N L Yim, S S Neibart, S N Lee, J Huo, T Coughlin, M M Mizrahi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Potential Targeting Mechanisms for Bone-Directed Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

D BravoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
A M JosephsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
V Bradaschia-CorreaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
M Z WongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
N L YimDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
S S NeibartDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
S N LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
J HuoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
T CoughlinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
M M MizrahiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
P LeuchtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States. Electronic address: philipp.leucht@nyumc.org.
New York University · US

Funding

Temporal balance between Notch and Wnt signaling during fracture healingK08AR069099 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LEUCHT, PHILIPP · 2016 to 2020
$904k
Skyscan 1172 Ex-vivo MicroComputed Tomography SystemS10OD010751 · OD · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI PARTRIDGE, NICOLA C · 2013 to 2013
$326k
NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR069099NIH HHS S10 OD010751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAminocaproic acid is approved as an anti-fibrinolytic for use in joint replacement and spinal fusion surgeries to limit perioperative blood loss. Previous animal studies have demonstrated a pro-osteogenic effect of aminocaproic acid in spine fusion models. Here, we tested if aminocaproic acid enhances appendicular bone healing and we sought to uncover the effect of aminocaproic acid on osteoprogenitor cells (OPCs) during bone regeneration.

methodsWe employed a well-established murine femur fracture model in adult C57BL/6J mice after receiving two peri-operative injections of aminocaproic acid. Routine histological assays, biomechanical testing and micro-CT analyses were utilized to assess callus volume, and strength, progenitor cell proliferation, differentiation, and remodeling in vivo. Two disparate ectopic transplantation models were used to study the effect of the growth factor milieu within the early fracture hematoma on osteoprogenitor cell fate decisions.

resultsAminocaproic acid treated femur fractures healed with a significantly smaller cartilaginous callus, and this effect was also observed in the ectopic transplantation assays. We hypothesized that aminocaproic acid treatment resulted in a stabilization of the early fracture hematoma, leading to a change in the growth factor milieu created by the early hematoma. Gene and protein expression analysis confirmed that aminocaproic acid treatment resulted in an increase in Wnt and BMP signaling and a decrease in TGF-β-signaling, resulting in a shift from chondrogenic to osteogenic differentiation in this model of endochondral bone formation.

conclusionThese experiments demonstrate for the first time that inhibition of the plasminogen activator during fracture healing using aminocaproic acid leads to a change in cell fate decision of periosteal osteoprogenitor cells, with a predominance of osteogenic differentiation, resulting in a larger and stronger bony callus. These findings may offer a promising new use of aminocaproic acid, which is already FDA-approved and offers a very safe risk profile.

Indexed as

ChondrogenesisFracture HealingOsteogenesisAminocaproic AcidAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBlood CoagulationBony CallusCellular MicroenvironmentFemoral FracturesHematomaMaleMice, Inbred C57BLPeriosteumPlasminogen ActivatorsSignal TransductionAminocaproic AcidPlasminogen ActivatorsAmicarBoneFracture hematomaOsteoblastOsteoprogenitor cellPeriosteum

Identifiers

PMID29680264
PMCPMC5970081
OpenAlexW2800758462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.